Bob wrote:
> 
> Another in my periodic series of questions dealing with "best 
> practices" (dontcha love bidness buzzwords?!) regarding remote 
> receivers:
> 
> In a system using remote receivers RF-linked back to a voter at the 
> main site, should each satellite (remote receiver, that is, 
> not "orbiting body") strip out and regenerate PL, or is it sufficient 
> to simply let PL pass through and let all decoding occur at the main 
> site?  Assume "flat" audio throughout.
> 
> Tnx es 73 de Bob
> K5IQ

That's how many repeaters here work, and it works fine. Besides the 
obvious advantage of having only one decoder (less hardware), the fact 
that you only have one decoder means access time is quicker. The more 
decoders that have to open to bring up the repeater, the longer it will 
take to bring it up.
It's probably also easier to match up the audio response and levels 
between the receivers, especially if you have an on-site rx that is 
hardwired.

-- 
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to