Well, as it HELPS to know if the repeater you are planning to put on the
air is technically sound to put on the air, I don't know what would be
on topic. Are we to be limited to talking about how to build HAM
repeaters only? (which don't need TA)
That said, who are you to decide what is off topic. Not every topic can
be of interest to everyone. If that were the case, nobody would be able
to discuss anything. Now if Kevin were to make such a post restricting
list use, that would be different, but I don't see you signing your post
as a moderator (or signing it as ANYTHING, for that matter).
I would hope Kevin would let the discussion continue, as it is of VITAL
importance to anyone putting a non-ham repeater on the air.
Personally, if a topic is not of interest to me, I use the delete button
rather than gripe about it - especially on the list. If you don't want
to see an entire thread, add it to your email client's auto-delete using
the subject as the filter. *Poof*! It's gone!
Joe M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> How about everyone concerned about "Type" acceptance
> and part 9x rules take this topic offline in private
> email whith those who get a Sh!#.
>
> This is a repeater builder forum "NOT FCC" land!
>
> Same thing goes for Coordination crap, take it
> offline!
>
> Everyone has an opinion about coordinators, who
> cares...
>
> This has nothing to do with Repeater-Builders.
>
> --- Kevin King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please provide the name of the FCC engineer that
> > told you this. And provide
> > the document number they referenced.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
