--- In [email protected], "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I love the RLS-1000 and the original
> RBS-1000. The RBS was an analog controlled
> version of the RLS-1000 (has a stand alone
> up). Audio is great, you can download the
> manual from the CAT Auto Controller Site.
>
> The 224.200 Machine mentioned...
> wasn't anywhere close to where we were
> working that weekend. Thanks for the RCA
> Manuals (I think). Someone gave me an RCA
> VHF Base Station last Sunday at the Sonoma
> Swap. Should I thank them?
>
> I really like the RLS-1000... it's a smart
> answer for those of us who use other brand
> controllers.
>
> skipp
>
>
> > "John Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Skipp.
> > Would you care to comment on the audio quality
> > and frequency response of the RLS-1000? I have
> > considered a pair of these for a project I
> > have going here in town using an RLCI use the RLS-1000 switch in
several of my projects and they work out great. I only have one
complaint about them and that is that the PL logic lines from each
port are summed together meaning that if any one radio indicates
active PL logic to the controller all of the connected radios do.
I only use the RLS-1000 on one of my ports on a link-comm controller
to bring in audio from three different receivers at the repeater site.
One the RLS-1000 ports is the main coordinated receiver and the other
two ports are just plain old Kenwood TM-X41 radios connected though
some com-spec PL decoders. Each of the decoders keep the intermod
heard on that port of the RLS-1000 to a minimum normally. If someone
were to talk in on the main receiver now that it has provided the
logic needed for the controller to start repeating all of the intermod
from the other receivers now comes right on though the repeater
because the PL logic is no longer keeping their noise from entering
the system.
I wish the RLS-1000 managed each of the logic lines for the CTCSS
logic separately instead of summing them together. The folks at C.A.T.
did tell me that they are coming out with a new 200 serious controller
with an RLS-1000 type switch built in to it that does exactly this
with its CTCSS logic line.
-1. I
> > could run the two ports on the RLC-1 as separate
> > repeaters (2 Mtrs and 220), and still have the
> > separate link and remote base ports using the
> > 2 RLS-1's.
> >
> > What say you?
> >
> > Also, was this controller problem happening when we were there? Or
> > did it happen after? I swear I didn't touch anything. ;-)
> >
> > Later. John ab6li
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
