At 11/26/2005 16:55, you wrote:
>Bob,
>
>I cannot state that Radio Mobile is not as accurate as a commercial program.
Well, IMO the remainder of your post attempts to implicitly bash RM in many
ways. Fair enough - it would be foolish for any multi-million dollar
corporation to try to save $10k on coverage prediction software. My only
claim is that it would be just as foolish for the average ham to blow the
lion's share of his or her repeater budget on the same software.
TASMA also uses RM as an aid to repeater coordination. Since we have to
deal with many other variables such as tropo ducting that can't be
accurately modeled, it doesn't make sense for us to try to fine-tune any
ITM software down to the nearest dB.
Bob NO6B
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
