Bob, Well, I guess the Rosetta Stone document is not as valuable as I had hoped. I went through it carefully, but found no statement of tone tolerance. However, I can infer from the printed frequencies- which are specified to 1/10 Hz- that the tolerance is +/- 0.1 Hz or better. That jibes with your assumption of well under one percent.
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY "Bob M." wrote: > I think all we wanted to find out was the frequency tolerance. Is that > in the document? The general consensus seemed to be well under 1 > percent, just based on the odd frequencies in use. > > Bob M. > ====== > --- Eric Lemmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A week ago, there was an exchange of postings > > regarding the > > specifications of the two-tone sequential paging > > format. After some > > searching of my Motorola archives, I found a > > document which I believe is > > the "Rosetta Stone" we seek. > > > > It is Motorola Publication 6881103C80, entitled > > "Two-Tone Sequential > > Tone Coding." This seven-page document includes the > > timing and > > deviation specifications, along with charts listing > > the various code > > plans. It costs about $3 from Motorola Parts. > > > > 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY > > > __________________________________ > Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
