At 1/14/2006 10:14, you wrote:

> > Given that batteries used in backup service rarely get cycled at all,
> > wouldn't car batteries be a more cost-effective choice? (assuming the
>gel
> > cels were not a gift)
>
>What's your replacement and disposal costs?
>
>Car batteries and marine deep cycle batteries aren't that different in
>price, and the deep cycle batteries are MUCH better at tolerating deep
>discharges.

My suggestion was under the assumption that car batteries were much 
cheaper, had better storage density & would only be deep discharged once or 
twice over their lifetime.  If none of this is true, then yes a deep cycle 
battery would make more sense.

Bob NO6B






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to