You know anyone who's been able to duplex a 110 watt 
mitrek at full output without getting something 
unwanted back into the receiver? 

Just curious...  I wouldn't think the mitrek chassis 
even with the extra shielding kits would be that good? 

skipp 

> TGundo 2003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any perticular reason why you want to run two radios instead of one?
>    
>   You can do that just fine. Duplex both radios and tune them both
up for tx and rx. then use them one tx one rx, but now you have backup
radios built in. If the pa dies on one radio you can just swap them in
the field and be up and runnng again!
>    
>   73
>    
>   Tom
>   W9SRV
> 
> Alexander N Tubonjic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   Hello,
> I am going to be changing a repeater setup a bit and I think it will
> work, I would like to get some feedback from you guy's and see what
> yall think. Here goes:
> The current setup is as follws:
> Duplexed 110 Watt Mitrek into controller and Duplexer, Nothing
> really fancy.
> What I want to do:
> Add a second Mitrek in line and have the new one act as RX only
> and have the current 110 Watter act as the TX. Now my questions are,
> can you run the Mitrek with only one channel element in it (i.e. can I
> run the TX Mitrek with only the TX element and the RX Mitrek with only
> the RX element in it?) Will I be able to make the Duplexed Mitrek act
> as only the TX or would I have to undo the duplex mod? 
> Like I said, in my mind it should work but I am not sure. Any
> thoughts/comments would be appreciated. Thanks.
> 
> Alexander
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>               
> ---------------------------------
>  
>  What are the most popular cars?  Find out at Yahoo! Autos
>









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to