> I'll take consistent performance over optimum performance when
> we're talking a one or two tenths of a dB in insertion loss
difference.
I understand the situation in those terms.
> So, if you lack test equipment and have no choice but to use high-
level
> signals for tuning the pass, you should still be tuning for minimum
> reflected power.
So bird inbetween TX and cans, tuning on a source like an HT?
> > Sounds like a nice piece of test equipment to have around: a 50
dB
> > non-directional coupler.
>
> Bird 4274-025 non-directional coupler element. I keep one in each
of my 43
> cases. Handy to have.
So that's what that is.. Never could find the exact same thing.
A "rare bird" :) With the part number, I see that RF parts carries
them.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
