Bob,

I think you got it right on. Placing in random lengths of cables (out 
of the junk drawer) between the band pass and the duplexer got 
different results. 

Re-reading the VE2AZX duplexer theory paper on the Repeater-Builder 
web site verified that the cable should be shorter than a 1/4 
wavelength.

It seems it's pretty random on what the proper length should be 
depending on the can used. The PD-1173 can used a shorter jumper than 
a DB-4001 can. This is probably where the right angle connector trick 
would come into play.

Thanks for you input, that really helped track it down.

Dwayne Kincaid
WD8OYG


>
> I think the length of coax you use between that BP
> filter and the rest of the duplexer is critical.
> 
> I have a 900 MHz duplexer that has a BP filter and a
> BP/BR filter on each side. The BP filter gives me 25dB
> attenuation 25 MHz away, and the BP/BR gives me about
> 45dB. But when connected together with what seems to
> be a 1/2 wavelength coax, I get 90dB attenuation. The
> whole is greater than the sum of its parts, somehow.
> 
> I'd suggest trying a piece of coax that's the same
> length as what's being used now, which might be 1/4 or
> 1/2 wavelength, to couple your BP filter to the
> duplexer.
> 
> Bob M.
> ======
> --- ldgelectronics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > This seems like a perplexing problem. Maybe someone
> > can point me in 
> > the right direction.
> > 
> > I have a TPD 1554, 4-can VHF duplexer. It provides
> > about 77 db of 
> > isolation with 1.4 db of loss. This is just about
> > what the spec says, 
> > so that all looks good.
> > 
> > I happen to have some extra PD-1173 VHF band pass
> > cans, so I'm 
> > thinking of adding a can on each side to get the
> > rejection up to 85 
> > db or so for use on a VHF repeater (Exec II base
> > station at 25 
> > watts). 
> > 
> > The bandpass can by its self shows about 0.5 db loss
> > and 8 db of 
> > rejection at 600 KHz. The curve on the spectrum
> > analyzer looks good 
> > and the return loss is very good (-40).
> > 
> > Here is where it gets messed up. I added a can on
> > the duplexer on the 
> > radio side (let's just say the RX side). The loss
> > goes up to 1.9 db 
> > as expected and the return loss is still good. But
> > when I go to 
> > measure the rejection, it now shows only 73 db. How
> > can this be?
> > 
> > Everything uses double sheilded cable and attenuator
> > pads are used on 
> > the input and output to the analyzer.
> > 
> > It seems like the rejection should be additive, but
> > for some reason 
> > it's not showing up that way. Anyone know why?
> > 
> > Dwayne Kincaid
> > WD8OYG
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to