I think I will continue to use crimps and  proper rubber seal wrap .

>From: Burt Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] LMR feedline revisited and revised!
>Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:12:41 -0400
>
>Hi folks
>
>I have heard that the military will not allow BNCs on RF connections
>because the bayonet connection on the outside shell allows the ground
>side of the cable to vary (wiggle) and be noisy.  BNCs appear to be used
>for data and low freq but TNCs are specified for RF use.
>
>Some years ago a local club was having trouble with their homebuilt
>duplexor that used BNC connectors on the cable connections.  The
>duplexor became noisy intermittantly.  Move the cables and it would
>quiet down for a few days but would always return.  I suppled them with
>equivalent TNC connectors for the duplexor and they never had trouble
>again from that source.
>
>The standard PL259/SO239 combo has an impedance of approximately 35
>ohms.  If the insulation is removed from the SO239, the impedance is
>close to 50 ohms.  I did see a Japanese wattmeter (I think it was Yaesu)
>that had insulatorless SO239s on it.
>
>One problem with the PL259 that I have not seen mentioned is that it is
>not weatherproof and the ground connection is problematic at best. It is
>very easy to tighten the shell and then find it loose because the
>"teeth" on the PL259 were not bottomed into the notches in the SO-239.
>
>Just my 2c for what it is worth.
>
>Burt  VE2BMQ>>
>
>Eric Lemmon wrote:
> > Allan,
> >
> > That's a good question!  Both "N" and "BNC" connectors vary the 
>dielectric
> > thickness, and the spacing and diameter of the center and shield 
>elements,
> > so that the swept impedance seen by a Time-Domain Spectrometer (TDR Test
> > Set) shows no variation in characteristic impedance through the 
>connector.
> > When a "Constant-Impedance" connector is installed <CORRECTLY> in a
> > transmission line, its presence will not be revealed when swept with a 
>TDR
> > Test Set.
> >
> > The infamous PL-259 plug, when mated with the matching SO-239 jack, is 
>far
> > from constant impedance.  Even the most basic TDR Test Set can detect 
>the
> > impedance "bump" where UHF connectors are used.  Where the impedance is 
>not
> > constant, unwanted parasitic oscillations can occur, which means that
> > intermodulation and spurious signals have a fertile breeding ground.
> >
> > Moreover, the ideal RF transmission system comprises cable and 
>connectors
> > that present a uniform 50-ohm impedance, without any significant bumps 
>or
> > dips.  This cannot be achieved with RF connectors that do not have 
>constant
> > impedance.
> >
> > 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of allan crites
> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 7:57 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] LMR feedline revisited and revised!
> >
> > I sure would like to hear what you all mean by " constant impedance ".
> > Allan Crites, WA9ZZU
> >
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Advertisement: Its simple! Sell your car for just $20 at carsales.com.au 
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fsecure%2Dau%2Eimrworldwide%2Ecom%2Fcgi%2Dbin%2Fa%2Fci%5F450304%2Fet%5F2%2Fcg%5F801577%2Fpi%5F1005244%2Fai%5F838588&_t=754951090&_r=tig&_m=EXT

Reply via email to