Kris Kirby wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, skipp025 wrote:
>> Don't know how practical it would be... but (some) rotating dopplers 
>> make a tone that can pass through a linked radio system. If the 
>> antenna array reference was known you might be able to get a general 
>> direction back to x-desired location. s.
> 
> If you use a diode-switched doppler system, the sidetone becomes 
> component of the signal, which one could detect on and correlate to a 
> particular direction. That tone, however, is related to antenna 
> switching speed, not direction. One could easily rig something to a 
> fixed dopper direction finder to generate a particular frequency based 
> on which antenna is selected and provideo an audible output that could 
> be directed to a repeater. 

The problem with such systems is the real-estate necessary at the 
repeater site for them.

The group here found many years ago that it was easier to get small 
places to put individual receivers directly at the airports, with single 
antennas (well, actually they have a 121.5 antenna and a UHF 1/4 wave to 
send alerts out to the repeater) than it would ever be to pay for enough 
antenna space at a repeater site for rotatable or electronically 
switched antenna solutions with multiple antennas.

In fact, you typically don't have to pay for them at all, and they'll 
throw in the small amount of AC power you draw for free... unlike a 
commercial communications site!

If you're hanging around aviation, there's always someone you know with 
a hangar that has power, and will let you put two tiny antennas on the 
roof, and run those to a locked NEMA box inside with your gadgets.  And 
in many cases the FBO themselves and/or the Airport Authority were happy 
to provide a spot.

We then augment the airport-based systems with one receiver way up high 
at the repeater site.

It leads to things like this:

- One alert monitor going off, it's probably at that airport.  Someone 
drives there and DF's it, since you already know where you CAN hear 
it... the hard part's done for you.

- One alert monitor going off, and the mountaintop receiver, it's 
probably at that airport and stronger.  (GRIN)

- More than one alert monitor and/or the mountain going off, it's likely 
airborne (and since we can listen to the audio from our monitors, you 
can listen to it fly off into the sunset, decreasing in signal strength 
everywhere... you can also usually tell what general direction it was 
going).

- Only the mountaintop receiver hearing it... that's the most likely 
time it could be "real"... or just at an airport we don't have covered 
yet.  (GRIN)

Anyway, as soon as any of them are determined to be non-emergency, we 
command the remote receivers and the mountaintop one to OFF, since 
retransmission of the 121.5 or 243.0 signals into Part 97 territory is a 
no-no unless it's an emergency.  Every ELT starts out an "emergency" and 
gets downgraded from there... (GRIN).

There's some other nifty features that the ham building/designing the 
airport monitors has done with them over the years, too many to mention 
really... but some of them are:

Anything "commandable" is handled via DTMF through the repeater and down 
to the little controllers at the airports.

- Voice alerts along with DTMF alerts, where the DTMF alert can be 
decoded elsewhere, allowing for an amazing array of features, driven by 
a computer somewhere "else".  Currently used for logging and e-mail 
alerts/pages.

- CW ID's (of course)

- Signal strength (RSSI) announcements during alerts.

- The ability to do various things including listen to 121.5, or 243.0, 
turn on/off alerts for any band.

- Measure and annouce AC input voltage and DC/battery backup voltage.

- Alert on door opening of the NEMA boxes (tampering) and/or check on 
the door closure switch status.

Etc etc etc... the list goes on.  It's basically been a decade-long 
project for him, with various new releases of his controller and 
controller's code for doing all of the above and more.  He's not 
interested in selling/supporting them outside our environment, however. 
  In our environment he has complete control over the radios used, etc. 
  Building a few of something you know is easy, building a "product" is 
a lot harder.

You can see the daily alerts (that DTMF during alerts thing again) at 
the website, http://www.fredf.org on the left sidebar.

Pick yesterday to see an ELT around 3AM at 2V2 (actually 2V2 may have 
changed identifiers recently, some changes needed in code...) and APA at 
around 11 AM.

Pick July 19th to see one that flew into the Denver Metro area, and 
landed at APA.  Heh... see how only the mountain (labeled "Repeater") 
only heard it until it landed?

And the 18th of July for the one I hunted down over at Adam Aircraft at 
APA.  It was in one of the brandy-new VLJ's under construction, the bird 
didn't even have a paint job on it.

I LOVE it when those guys set one off, you get to see the new/pretty 
birds up close and personal!  And a non-painted Adam bird, not even 
airworthy yet, is probably about as new as you'll ever get!  :-)

Probably the only perk of ELT hunting... is getting to see the pretty 
birds... and inform their poor owners that the ELT has been running over 
an hour... "Sorry you'll have to replace that battery, but nice airplane!"

Nate WY0X

Reply via email to