On Aug 30, 2007, at 1:20 AM, MCH wrote: > Height = elevation AMSL of the antenna, HAAT, or AGL (which would make > no sense)?
I assumed HAAT for my calculations and that number seemed to be the most sane, after trying a few. But I think the resulting number is generous for a badly-built repeater, and too small for a well-built one. -- Nate Duehr, WY0X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
