Joel,

I aggree the major is the equipment working.  If it aint broke don't fix it.

Test gear measurments allow determining the source of a problem if there is a 
problem.  If your ears say it aint working what is not working and in this case 
might not be the duplexer.  Yes the test gear measurements do make a big 
difference.

In a repeater there is so much that has to work.

73, ron, n9ee/r

ps: with the start of this discussion has anyone said what type, model, etc of 
duplexer it is???  Might be a clue.




>From: Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2007/08/29 Wed PM 03:49:32 CDT
>To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer input and output power

>                  
>Ok Skipp, and Jesse, So, I supposed that the specification of such, should be 
>presented by the manufacturers of the said, and with the said, right!  Or 
>there is a general concept for duplexers, as in both examples, .1 to 3dB 
>Jesse, and Skipp input loss 15 to 35%  And which will be more accurate to work 
>from dB or %. I always try to get a good balance when I'm tuning duplexers, 
>most times I ended up taking a loss on the power for a better result on the 
>receiver side, is this the best way to go?  Or it depends on your situation, 
>whether or not the extra power would effect your  weakest signal!  (most times 
>a final touch up is done at the repeater site, it always make me feel like a 
>"perfectionist") Sometimes I still depend on my ears, then take a look at the 
>test gears, 99% of the time I go with my ears because the difference don't be 
>much when the duplexers are setup to the test gear figures.  So, is the 
>figurers always the right thing to work with, or they are just guides for a 
>Tech with a bad hearing? v44kai.....Joel.   ----- Original Message -----   
>Fom:  Jesse Lloyd  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com    Sent: Wednesday, 
>August 29, 2007 12:54   PM  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re:   Duplexer 
>input and output power  
>Ya, duplexers will have insertion loss.  Typically you get   more insertion 
>loss with more rejection, so its a balancing   act.
>
>Insertion loss can range from .1 dB (very good) to 3   dB.
>
>Typically if I can get a duplexer to less than a dB I'm   happy.
>
>Insertion loss (dB) = 10 log ( PIN /   POUT )
>
>So Pout = Pin x 10^(Insertion   Loss/10)
>
>So for 50 Watts:
>
>.1 dB = 48.9 Watts
>.3 = 46.7
>.5   = 44.6
>.8 = 41.6
>1 = 39.7
>1.2 = 37.9
>1.5 = 35.4
>2 = 31.5
>2.5   = 28.1
>3 = 25
>
>Jesse
>
>
>  On 8/29/07, skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                      
>Hi Joel, 
>
>In the real world it depends on the duplexer type, size,     quality,
>operation and setup values, which may be fixed or adjustable.     
>
>Just throwing out a generic rule of thumb... you will find many     
>duplexers lose about 15% to 35% of the input power. One would hope     
>for near zero loss but that will never happen. 
>
>A common quality     duplexer has adjustable probes or coax ports (the 
>name used is based on     the duplexer type), which often trade what we 
>generic call insertion     loss for increased performance. 
>
>Loss through a duplexer is not     always a linear graph of power in 
>vs power out. 
>
>Just to put     something out... be happy if a properly setup and 
>working duplexer     delivers 75% to maybe 95% of the input power. 
>Be grateful if you receive     better than 85% of the rated power. 
>A really "tight" duplexer might eat     as much as 35% to 40% of 
>your input power and there are much worse     possible examples. 
>
>cheers,
>s. 
>
>> "Joel"    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a table or formula or ratio for     power input to a duplexer, 
>> to the resulting output power of the     said? For instance, if I put 
>> 10, 20, 50, 100 watts to the input,     what should be the output, with 
>> a 50 Ohms at the load?
>>     
>> example 10,20, 50, 100 watts in = x output @ 50 Ohms. "BASED     
>> ON A PROPERLY TUNED DUPLEXER"
>> 
>> I think someone had     a short for-instance on this, can't find it, 
>> and will like some     insight on this.
>> v44kai.....Joel.
>
>
>  
>    
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free   Edition. 
>Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.10/977 - Release Date:   8/28/2007 
>4:29 PM
>            


Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.


Reply via email to