At 8/31/2007 11:18, Nate Duehr wrote: >FYI. > >Cross-posting to IllinoisDigitalHam list and Repeater-Builder list from >the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. > >Thoughts folks? > >Thanks to Mark N5RFX for doing real testing.
Thanks Nate. This is most informative. Now if you throw in the added benefit of DStar's error correction coding, I believe 10 kHz is the ideal channel spacing. Which is good for us here in SoCal because TASMA just voted to create 4 auxiliary link pairs for very narrow band digital systems at 145.585, 145.595, 145.605 & 145.615 outputs (inputs all -600 kHz). With the 10 kHz spacing, currently only DStar systems are compatible so they're essentially DStar pairs. I expect all 4 pairs to be assigned to 1 or more DStar systems at our next coordination meeting. Bob NO6B
