Ron,

Maybe you could tell us why coax cable has a lower frequency limit? You
claim that it does but have not explained why or how.

Why does the impedance change significantly at lower frequencies?



73
Gary  K4FMX


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:Repeater-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wright
> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 8:49 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers
> 
> Gary,
> 
> Yes the HP meter was spec'd to go below below 0.5 MHz, it went down to 100
> kHz.
> 
> I don't know where the confusion is...all coax and feedline has a upper
> and lower freq limit.  Might try to learn something about this.
> 
> I know about low freq RF.  Worked on a Navy program that used 18 kHz, a
> C130 aircraft with 30,000 ft of wire hung out the back as a platform to
> talk to surmerged submarines.  Ran over 250 kW.  It was called TACMO.  Due
> to the weight the wings kept falling off...well they were continously
> inspected and replaced before they fell off, but the aircraft was
> deffinitly over loaded.  Had generators on all 4 engines to get the power
> they needed.  Now that was a repeater.
> 
> However, AC power distribution is not trying to radiate power, but
> transfer it with widly varing loads.  Totally different engineering.
> 
> At low frequencies such as 1 kHz little radiation takes place.  Far less
> at 60 Hz.  The EMF returns to the radiator, wire, before the next cycle
> can force it out.  This is a problem in some applications, but since most
> do not want radiation it is not.
> 
> 73, ron, n9ee/r
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Gary Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: 2007/08/31 Fri PM 05:59:28 CDT
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers
> 
> >
> >Are you sure that the impedance meter you used was speced for operation
> >below .5 MHz?
> >
> >Yes all capacitors have inductance. Lead length is particularly a
> problem.
> >
> >15 KHz can be treated as RF or audio it all depends on what transducer
> you
> >are using it to couple it with. Use a speaker and it is audio. Use an
> >antenna it is RF. All RF propagates the same on a transmission line. 15
> KHz
> >or even 1 KHz propagates as RF just like any RF signal does through the
> air
> >and even thru the ground as in the case of low frequencies. Read about
> what
> >some of the VLF guys are doing.
> >
> >On a video cable remove the termination on the far end of the cable and
> look
> >at the reflected energy. It has the same effect at those frequencies as
> it
> >does at HF or VHF.
> >
> >Yes long runs of video cable can be a problem. Long runs of cable in the
> >catv industry have the same problems of frequency roll off. They call it
> >"tilt" and their amplifiers have compensation for cable attenuation in
> order
> >to make the system "flat".
> >
> >I have an HP signal level meter that measures RF from 10 Hz to 30 MHz. I
> can
> >feed an audio oscillator set to 1 KHz or 1 MHz into the same input as I
> feed
> >a 1 MHz RF generator into. The signal level meter handles it the same.
> Only
> >difference is the output impedance of the audio oscillator is 600 ohms
> >rather than 50 ohms. The instrument doesn't know or care if we want to
> call
> >it audio or RF. As far as it is concerned it treats it as RF.
> >
> >I have an audio amplifier that has just about a flat response from around
> 5
> >Hz to 1 MHz. Is that an audio amplifier or an RF amplifier?  :>)
> >
> >73
> >Gary  K4FMX
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:Repeater-
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wright
> >> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 7:12 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers
> >>
> >> Gary,
> >>
> >> To measure the impedance of the RG59 I used an HP impedence meter which
> >> displayed Z and phase.  I use to use it to determine where caps became
> >> resonant as a demo for many caps look inductive above a given freq.
> Mica
> >> caps did pretty good, but still hard to find a cap at 1000 pf that was
> a
> >> cap above 25 MHz.  These become issues in bypass caps and also for
> >> resonant circuits trying to get higher Qs where the C is large.
> >>
> >> In a good lab one often has tons of test equipment for making
> >> measurements, even spectrum anal that go down to tenths of Hz and to
> many
> >> GHz.  I've had the previdlege of working in such places and some was
> for
> >> my use in my work.
> >>
> >> I know RG59 is a most commonly used cable in video.  However, one does
> not
> >> have to go far before it really affects video especially color where
> the
> >> phase is so important.  Also the syncs get torn up so bad monitors
> loose
> >> sync on the veritical retrace and a portion of the picture is torn at
> the
> >> top.  Many manufactures make line amps that not only compenstate for
> loss,
> >> but varied freq response and some for sync...the better ones do sync
> also.
> >> The vertical sync is at about 60 Hz and horiz at 15734 Hz which is in
> the
> >> audio freq where the signal is not really propergating like in RF.
> Many
> >> things change.  Of course for a run of couple hundred feet this is not
> a
> >> problem, but long runs it becomes one.
> >>
> >> 73, ron, n9ee/r
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >From: Gary Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >Date: 2007/08/30 Thu PM 07:39:21 CDT
> >> >To: [email protected]
> >> >Subject: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers
> >>
> >> >
> >> >I wonder what you were using to measure the impedance of the cable
> with
> >> >below .5 MHz?
> >> >Some cable especially rg59 types have copper clad steel center
> >> conductors.
> >> >If the copper clad is very thin low frequencies can penetrate the
> copper
> >> >clad and get into the steel where the loss can go up substantially. If
> >> you
> >> >are using that cable to transform an impedance the additional lose can
> >> make
> >> >the impedance transformation something other than expected. The
> impedance
> >> >will be closer to the characteristic impedance of the cable rather
> than
> >> the
> >> >expected transformation impedance.
> >> >But to have the characteristic impedance fall apart at .5 MHz would be
> a
> >> >mystery. 75 ohm cable is used extensively in video base band
> applications
> >> >where flat low frequency response is needed.
> >> >
> >> >73
> >> >Gary  K4FMX
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:Repeater-
> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wright
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:48 AM
> >> >> To: [email protected]
> >> >> Subject: Re: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers
> >> >>
> >> >> Gary,
> >> >>
> >> >> I've measured RG59 cable terminated into a 75 Ohm resistive load
> with a
> >> >> variable freq impedance meter.  We found the coax stopped being 75
> Ohms
> >> >> below about 0.5 MHz. The cable manufacture also verified this.
> Other
> >> >> engineers in our department knew of this as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> We were designing security systems using video and the vertical and
> >> >> harizonal sync signals became very distored over long, 2500 ft. RG59
> >> >> cables and this was the major reason.  We had to design circuits
> that
> >> >> corrected this, but the cable had the problem.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am sure different RG59 cables have different low freq bandwidths.
> >> RG11
> >> >> would also be different as well as cable TV cable.
> >> >>
> >> >> All coax has a lower and upper frequency range.  Since we deal with
> >> radio
> >> >> this is not much of a factor until one gets real low or GHz levels.
> >> >>
> >> >> Coax also has the problem of a upper freq limit due to it's outer
> >> shield
> >> >> becomes large enough to act as wave guide.  One will see upper freq
> >> specs
> >> >> will be lower  the larger cable.
> >> >>
> >> >> 73, ron, n9ee/r
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >From: Gary Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> >Date: 2007/08/29 Wed PM 09:23:57 CDT
> >> >> >To: [email protected]
> >> >> >Subject: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexers
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >As far as bandwidth goes,,, where do you get this .5 MHz for rg59
> >> cable
> >> >> as a
> >> >> >lower limit?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Open wire lines begin to radiate as frequency is increased to the
> >> point
> >> >> >where the line spacing becomes an appreciable portion of a wave
> length
> >> >> due
> >> >> >to the time it takes for propagation of fields between wires.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >73
> >> >> >Gary  K4FMX
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Ron Wright, N9EE
> >> >> 727-376-6575
> >> >> MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
> >> >> Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
> >> >> No tone, all are welcome.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Ron Wright, N9EE
> >> 727-376-6575
> >> MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
> >> Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
> >> No tone, all are welcome.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Ron Wright, N9EE
> 727-376-6575
> MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
> Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
> No tone, all are welcome.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to