So to plug some numbers in:

Say you have a cable with the following specs (50 ohm cable)
Capacitance of 100.3 pF/m
Inducatance of 251 nH/m
Resistane of 0.164 ohms/m
Shunt conductance of 12.8 mS/m


Zo = sqrt [ (R + j 2 pi f L ) / (G  + j 2 pi f C ) ]


at 100 Hz= 113 ohms

at 1 Khz= 111 ohms

at 10 Khz=  97 ohms

at 100 Khz=  65 ohms

at 1 Mhz= 52 ohms

at 100 Mhz= 50 ohms

at 1 Ghz= 50 ohms

Proved.com

Jesse



On 9/2/07, Ron Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   Jeff,
>
> I have plenty of text books here, oh well. All refer to impedance as Z and
> Z=R+jX or Z = magnitude and phase angle. A 500 Ohm resistor has an impedance
> of 500 Ohms or 500+j0 or 500 0 deg phase.
>
> I think in Jesse's and my last posting you might see about the low and
> high freq differences in coax. Maybe not.
>
> Oh well. Good discussion.
>
> 73, ron, n9ee/r
>
> >From: Jeff DePolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <jeff%40depolo.net>>
> >Date: 2007/09/02 Sun PM 12:12:51 CDT
> >To: [email protected] <Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> >Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re:
> Duplexers
>
> >
> >> Impedance refers to both R and X, resistance and reactance. Impedance
> >affects all current flow, DC and AC. X affects AC only.
> >
> >Impedance is specific to AC. There's no such thing as impedance at DC,
> only
> >resistance. Look up in the definition of impedance in any engineering
> text
> >and you'll find that it only applies to AC.
> >
> >A cable's characteristic impedance is determined by the ratio of E to I
> when
> >there are no reflections on the line. Reflections can only exist when the
> >current being carried is varying, i.e. an AC waveform.
> >
> >A coaxial cable that has a 75 ohm characteristic impedance will conduct
> >steady-state DC at any E to I ratio, and will do so without reflection.
> The
> >cable does not perform any transformation regardless of the load, unlike
> the
> >AC case.
> >
> >> No a coax will not function the same at 5 Hz as it does at 2 meters.
> >
> >Why not?
> >
> >> Evidently you have not had the previledge of working with
> >> equipment or engineers that allows one to look at some of
> >> these issues.
> >
> >Oh, I think have...
> > --- Jeff
> >
> >
>
> Ron Wright, N9EE
> 727-376-6575
> MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
> Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
> No tone, all are welcome.
>
>  
>

Reply via email to