We had a VHF 70mhz once have other frequencies coming through and on
inspection we found a small area of corrosion in one tin at the base plate 
once cleaned all ok again .
 
Thank You,
Ian Wells,
Kerinvale Comaudio,
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Jesse Lloyd
Date: 3/09/2007 7:17:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Cleaning of duplexers...pt 2
 
I agree skipp, just lube it up and use it... unless it was buried in a pile
of sand I cant see many benefits to cleaning it, other than getting familiar
with the inside of a duplexer.  Generally I don't ever open duplexers, a
pain in the neck to take a part and way to easy to mess up putting them back
together.  The only time I had to do that was on a sinclair one when I
dropped the rod into the can...oops.

Jesse



On 9/2/07, skipp025 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
Why is everyone so crazy to clean the inside of Motorola 
T-1500 duplexer bottle body with cleaners? 

Unless there is some pitting on the plunger body... you need only 
blow out the dust, put a little tiny bit of lube (I use dry silicon, 
teflon, or Amsoil MP) on the threaded shaft and slowly spin the 
plunger up and down through its range a few times. 

The finger stock is set up by design to polish the plunger body 
as it goes up and down. 

Silly people use the wrong type of wire wheel to scratch and embed 
metal into the plunger body. I've never found a need to use sand 
paper... 

s. 

> "georgiaskywarn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Had an experience with using "TarnX" in cleaning some Moto cans. Had a 
> friend of mine that used this with great success. I used it...had 
> issues. The difference is he used "running water" when I used a "pan 
> of water". Didn't clean off very well...so corrosion came on even 
> faster because the "Murratic Acid" (sp?) didn't clean off very well.
> 
> Got to thinking (because I have to do this again), why not just 
> use "Murratic Acid" which is used in pool cleaning products. A gallon 
> of this...deluted...is MUCH cheaper than the "smallish" bottles 
> of "TarnX".
> 
> Anybody use this before??? 
> 73
> Robert
>




 
 

Reply via email to