Sound familiar to a problem I've had in the past. Try to see 
if the problem duplicates when the transmit power from the 
PA is placed into a termination (dummy load). Don't forget 
to properly terminate the unused duplexer port if you're not 
on a combiner.

Might actually be an rf generated problem and/or some of the 
extra jumpers in place that are not really needed. If you download 
my msr-2000 text... I mention what min jumpers are needed on 
the back plane. 

cheers, 
skipp 

> Jay Urish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Whats going on is it seems like every once in awhile, after a few 
> kerchunks, it the machine starts feeding back on it self and the COR
and 
> PL detect lines start pulsing simultaneously. I still have some more 
> troubleshooting to do, when I can get back to the site.
> 
> skipp025 wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Flaky on the TX or RX side? Tone reeds do fail and get flaky.
> > 
> > In many cases you can actually swap the reeds to the other
> > location (regardless of what the labels might say). If the
> > problem moves to "the other side" function... you know the
> > reed needs to be replaced.
> > 
> > I've replaced lots of tone reeds & rc networks, never an
> > entire card.
> > 
> > I've also replaced the card with a Comm Spec TP-3200 and I have
> > the information you're asking about. But I've also revised that
> > modification quite a bit since the initial write-up. Maybe get
> > you a copy of it on Tuesday if you really want it... still.
> > 
> > cheers,
> > skipp
> > 
> >  > Jay Urish <jay@> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Does anybody have and notes or down n' dirty drawings on best
practice
> >  > for integrating a ts-64 to the msr2000? I think my PL card is
flaky,
> > and
> >  > I have a space ts64...
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Jay Urish W5GM
> >  > ARRL Life Member Denton County ARRL VEC
> >  > N5ERS VP/Trustee
> >  >
> >  > Monitoring 444.850 PL-88.5
> >  >
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Jay Urish W5GM
> ARRL Life Member      Denton County ARRL VEC
> N5ERS VP/Trustee      
> 
> Monitoring 444.850 PL-88.5
>


Reply via email to