Reminds me of 'W6JJ4'.
On 9/26/07, n9wys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don, > > This is an "experimental" callsign. The reason I'm familiar with this is I > tried to obtain a "WC9" callsign for my county's EMA Ham Club - that was > also denied since WC and WD prefixes are experimentals. (BTW - we ended up > with W9WIL.) > > Which system was he on? SARA, CFMC? I'd be interested in listening to hear > this guy some time... Maybe I'd even query him on his callsign. Hehehehe > > Moderator note: Sorry for the OT thread... > > Mark - N9WYS > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] On Behalf Of Don > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 2:31 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Call Sign and Sounds like a Ham , NOT > > I found something interesting and Thought Would share, I heard a > Ham talking as He was driving through the Chicago Metro area on a > large Repeater System , and when I am near the Computer , I Just > look up the Call to find more info about the person to see If We > might have something in common to talk about > > I looked up His call WD9XAD On http://www.qrz.com/ and > http://hamcall.net/call nothing Found , Sure looks like a Older Call > and the Person talked like a Ham > > But now days who knows so I went to the FCC Site > http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/reports7/ > > Top Search for Call sign Well it came up But NOT A Ham radio call, I > doubt very much if it was the Person with the Non ham lic using it, > But I found it interesting and Nice to learn something as We get > older, it's just remembering it is the Problem Back in the Old Days > We just took people at their word , But with the Internet I find > things are not always what We think . > > 73 De Don KA9QJG > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
