On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:35 PM, John Barrett wrote:

> A repeater is NOT full duplex.. it is not simultaneously processing  
> completely separate audio streams in and out.. it is processing the  
> SAME audio in and out. There is only ONE audio path – full duplex  
> requires TWO. Telephones accomplish this by modulating both audio  
> signals on a common “carrier” (the DC power provided by the telco),  
> modems do it by using different tone frequencies for send and  
> receive.. essentially half duplex, but coerced into being full  
> duplex by the behavior of the telephone line. The modems accomplish  
> this by negotiating which modem will use which frequencies (hence  
> all the V## protocols.. they define how the modems negotiate)
>
> A repeater is NOT bidirectional – audio streams flow in only one  
> direction, from sender to reciever
>
> From this point of view the repeater is a filter in a half duplex  
> link. The only reason a repeater uses 2 frequencies is because you  
> cannot transmit on the same frequency as you receive..
>
> Full duplex direct (non-repeater) RF links require 2 frequencies..  
> one transmit for user A, and one transmit for user B.. this is a  
> true example of full duplex.. both streams are completely  
> independent, and have no influence on the other except through  
> “processing” at the end points, human, computer, or otherwise.
>
> You could accomplish an apparent full duplex repeater link in RF  
> using 3 frequencies… 2 for input, one for output, and mix the  
> inputs. The only problem is the 2 users have to agree which input  
> they will use (oooo shades of modem negotiation here !!)… a Party  
> Line, or Conference Call would require one input per user.. In each  
> of these cases, all users listen to the same output.
>

John, you've hit on what I was struggling to describe...

Coming from the datacomm world I see "full-duplex" as both senders of  
information can send separate information at the same time... without  
interrupting each other.

But Joe's dictionary definition of full-duplex is also technically  
correct, just applied differently.

(We need better terminology to really describe these differences  
concisely.)

--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to