--- In [email protected], "wb7cjq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a tough one. Not much info. available.  I have the 
programmer 
> schematic, frequency plan (FCC), the programming software, etc.  
But 
> this is a trunking radio - it doesn't like non-trunked stuff.  Just 
> today, after a year's worth of research, I got a pair of them 
working 
> simplex.  
> 
> As you may or may not know, the trunking units wait for a response 
> from 'daddy' before they'll go key-down.  So that was the first 
hurdle -
>  get TAC working.  Done...
> 
> I'm still learning about these beasts, so can only offer what I've 
> discovered thus far...  You probably know most of this already...  
They 
> are designed to TX below 900, RX in the 935 range.  TAC puts the TX 
up 
> into the 935 range.  So, from the TX perspective, these units could 
> easily do 900 ham frequencies.
> 
> The programming software wants an FCC channel number, then 
(apparently) 
> the radio translates that into a frequency.  I'm not sure about 
this 
> part just yet...  Could be that the software does the translation 
and 
> ships the result to the radio...  Not sure...
> 
> If you don't already have it, you need the programmer and the 
> software.  At least at that point you can get into test mode.  Once 
in 
> test mode, you can adjust squelch, encode/decode levels, etc.  
Plus, 
> you can get simplex up and running.  The test mode data is firmware 
> within the rig - so you can program all you want - break it 9 ways 
from 
> Sunday - but if you invoke test mode, that data is still right 
there!  
> This one saved my butt!!!
> 
> Please advise if I can help at all.  RELM has only one guy that 
knows 
> this radio and the programming software, so, obviously, he's 
> swamped!!!  I have a good dialogue going with him, and have nearly 
all 
> of the stuff that Uniden issued for this particular model.
> 
> Building a programmer is key.  You gotta go do that!!!  The Uniden 
> programmer is over $300...  I built mine for maybe $10 tops...
> 
> The circuit uses a MAX-232 chip, 3 2N2222 type transistors, and a 
run-
> of-the-mill PNP transistor.  Also a 5v regulator of some sort...  A 
few 
> resistors, a few caps., you're done!!!
> 
> The software wants to run under DOS.  NOT a DOS window - PURE DOS.  
I 
> tried it from numerous versions of Windows, and on numerous PCs.  
> NOPE!!!  Boot up via DOS 6.22 and run from a floppy!  Trust me - it 
> will save you DAYS' of work!!!  I debugged my programmer 4 times 
before 
> deciding to try the floppy route.  Days and days wasted!!!
> 
> At this point, after a year of fighting with these guys, I'm 
thrilled 
> to have a signal on the air, anywhere!!!  So now, the issue becomes 
how 
> to move them into the ham band???
> 
> According to RELM, there's a data stream issued upon transmit.  
And, 
> the receiver is looking for a particular data stream as well.  
There 
> are over 2000 possible combinations.
> 
> If you're looking to put up an analog squelch type repeater, 
you're  
> probably going to have to go to the innards of the rig and 
circumvent 
> the rig's squelch processing - firmware...  For a repeater, that's 
> easy - tap the discriminator and build an external COS circuit.
> 
> I tried this today:  Keyed up a different rig on a 900 channel, and 
> then tried to key up the Uniden on the same freq.  It refused to 
go.  
> It also DID NOT open the squelch!  So, the receiver is seeing the 
900 
> signal, but the squelch processing is refusing to open the 
squelch.  
> Hence my recommendation to pick a signal off of the disc. and 
process 
> it externally.
> 
> The next oddity is that there's an odd offset built in.  
38.9MHz...  My 
> freq. counter confirms.  And RELM confirms.  So, the freq. meter 
reads 
> 10KHz off from the FCC assigned frequency.  Go figure.  Now this 
only 
> happens under certain programming parameters, and this one I still 
> don't understand...
> 
> I programmed channel 15 into one rig and it came out on the 
assigned 
> freq. of 935.1875.  I ADDED channel 15 to another rig and it came 
out 
> on 935.1865!!!  I reversed the radios, programmed again, etc. --- 
all 
> day long today - and STILL got these odd results.
> 
> I finally gave up tonight and programmed both of them back to 
channel 
> 15 ONLY, and they're BOTH on the assigned freq. according to the 
freq. 
> counter.   Go figure...  There's something in there about the 
group, 
> home repeater, TAC channel, something - that causes the offset to 
> occur.  Wish I knew what it was !!!
> 
> Anyway, if I can help with the software, schematics, FCC channel 
> assignments, etc., please advise.
> 
> Now what I don't know, and what we ALL LOVE to know, is how to get 
them 
> into the ham band!  They'll go below and above, so it is either 
reverse-
> engineering the programming software, or getting into the radio and 
> changing the tables that are in the PROM in there, or inserting 
another 
> uP in there (as they had to do with the Motorola MTX-900)...  At 
the 
> moment, I can't say which will happen.  My first guess is that the 
> programming software needs to be hacked as it won't take anything 
> beyond the FCC assigned frequencies.  That tells me that the 
software 
> has a translation table that could be edited...  This is VERY old 
code -
>  1980's-1990's...  Written for XT and AT type PC's...
> 
> I no longer have all of those low-level programming tools.  But the 
> first thing I'd do if I did, would be to crawl through the built-in 
> table and modify it.  An educated guess is that one could get the 
radio 
> to take ham frequencies.  I'm almost positive that the "cramp" is 
the 
> programming software itself.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Dave.
> 
>  Whooops, it looks like a yahoo email misfunction...
I'll try again...

Dave, your email address is no good, so if you're still out there, 
I'd love to hear from you about the Programmer.


Dick, W7TIO

> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "kf4vgx" <kf4vgx@> wrote:
> >
> > Need programing information on this radio to setup as a repeater.
> > 
> >   Any information is appreciated.    73 John
> >
>


Reply via email to