Ian, I think you missed my comment on the way the
extra receiver implementation would work. I proposed
using a circuit that gives priority to the regular
repeater receiver for that system. This would lock
out the auxillary receiver during input on one
repeater, and by transmitting CTCSS only while a user
is active, there would never be a case where both
auxillary receivers would be enabled, so that locking
the two together continuously would not happen. I
even have a custom circuit that I have posted to the
group that provides that priority to one receiver.
I still think it is a viable solution to linking two
repeaters together, but I have not implemented it so
can't be for certain sure. I'll be interested in your
solution if and when you get it implemented.
73 - Jim W5ZIT
--- Kerincom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Jim .The main idea is that our business
> clients can have some extra
> range and also retain privacy so other users that
> share it carn't hear the
> other businesses on the channel.We only currently
> have 3 businesses that
> share the 1st site each with their own ctcss
> tones.With your second
> paragraph we found that having a separate link radio
> at each end could
> possibly cause continous linking of the sites and
> lock the repeaters
> together in transmission
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
