Hi Skip and Joe,

Yes, placing attenuators in line can tell you a lot about IM and
interference problems.

In Joe's case it would be interesting to know if placing an attenuator
in the antenna line (assuming a shared receive/transmit antenna)
produces an equivalent reduction in the NOAA signal, or a two or three
fold reduction.  That could provide some more clues as to the location
of the actual mixing.
 
BTW, You could also use a lower gain antenna instead of a power
attenuator.  High gain antennas are not always a good idea :-)

73,
Mark vk3byy



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of skipp025
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2008 4:56 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Interference on a 6 meter repeater
> 
> Re: Interference on a 6 meter repeater 
> 
> You are living one of my past nightmares... Let me give you 
> the probable fix first. 
> 
> If you have them, try a number of attenuator pads in series with 
> the Yaesu Radio. First might be a 10 dB pad and back the values 
> down while testing for grunge.  
> 
> I ended up using a 3 dB pad in series with the Yaesu Radio... the 
> problem generator radio still worked just fine in the intended 
> operation and the 3dB pad fixed the problem.  Of course the pad 
> will have to take the attenuated transmit power value. 
> 
> Yes I tried cavities and shook my head when they didn't work (even 
> multiple cavities and really high insertion loss settings) 
> regardless of configurations. 
> 
> The front end of some Yaesu Radios can be a real serious problem 
> maker... been there, done that, coffee mug and tee shirt. You can 
> tell the Yaesu Owner their radio is probably causing other problems 
> besides your issue and they should deal with it as best possible.
> My fix was the pad option short of replacing the radio.  
> 
> Try the high power pad... and hope the 3dB value is enough to 
> knock the problem out of the ball park. Let us know if it works 
> for you. 
> 
> cheers, 
> s. 
> 
> > Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've been working on an interference problem on a 6 meter 
> repeater and 
> > would like to pass it by the "brain trust" for some input.
> > 
> > The repeater is on 53.85Mhz with the input on 52.85Mhz.  When the 
> > repeater is keyed up, NOAA weather radio comes through the
repeater 
> > output loud and clear. (Decode PL turned off)  I identified 
> the problem 
> > as intermodulation in a Yaesu VX-2500V transceiver at the 
> site used for 
> > telemetery on a simplex frequency of 173.3375Mhz.  The mix is:
> > 
> > 4(53.85)-162.55=52.85 (repeater input)
> > 
> > The VHF transceiver frequency is not involved in the mix, 
> but the PA 
> > stage of the Yaesu is where the mix is being created.  I 
> proved this by 
> > disconnecting the coax to the Yaesu and the IM goes away.  
> Also, when 
> > the Yaesu keys up on 173.3375, the interference goes away on the 
> > repeater.  The IM is only being caused when the Yaesu 
> transceiver is in 
> > the receive mode.  No cavity is on the Yaesu, it goes 
> directly to the 
> > antenna.
> > 
> > The site is on a water tank, so there is only about 10 feet of 
> > horizontal separation between the telemetry antenna and the 6
meter 
> > repeater antenna.  The NOAA station is running 500 watts 
> 1.6 mile away, 
> > line of site.  I added a VHF cavity tuned to 173.3375 to the Yaesu

> > telemetry radio, but it did not fix the problem.  (The can 
> had about 
> > 25dB rejection at 162.55Mhz and about 40dB rejection at 53.85Mhz.)

> > Prior testing showed that reducing the 6 meter repeater 
> output from 25 
> > watts to 2 watts solved the problem. 
> > 
> > My next thought is to put a highpass filter and the VHF cavity in
> series 
> > with the telemetry radio antenna.  I am thinking of using a 
> 6/2 meter 
> > diplexer, terminate the 6 meter port with 50 ohms, and connect the

> > telemetry radio to the 2 meter port.  The diplexer should give
good 
> > rejection to the 6 meter signal going into the telemetry 
> radio (along 
> > with the additional isolation of the VHF cavity) and the VHF
cavity 
> > would give rejection of the NOAA radio signal.  If this 
> works, I will 
> > contact TX/RX and see what they can provide to make the 
> installation 
> > professional.  We are guests at the site and need to 
> provide something 
> > professional to the water company.
> > 
> > Any ideas?  We already thought of changing frequency on the 6
meter 
> > repeater, but that would be difficult to coordinate.
> > 
> > 73, Joe, K1ike
>  

Reply via email to