Unless you want to spend time with the proper test equipment, it 
is probably a lot more prudent to make all the cavities in your 
mini antenna system the same or very similar types. 

The stacked T-1500 duplexer layout I describe has the antenna 
ports joined with another T... while this works fairly well one 
could probably do better by coupling each of the series cavities 
into an N-Way ... aka star.  

You could combine duplexers with n-multiple lengths of coax or 
hard line but every extra section(s) is loss, bandwidth restrictive 
and another impedance bump I'd rather do without. 

Two back to back T-1500 duplexers are pretty much the same layout 
as the factory supplied Microwave Associates unit at x-times the 
cost. 

If you want to be uniform... find another T-1500 off ebay cheap 
enough. 

cheers, 
s. 

(ps: What's an N-Way... oh about 4 pounds... :-) 

old bad joke... sorry. 



> Cort Buffington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> T-1500 type is what's in the commercial repeater (micor). 
> My repeater  
> has a Wacom WP-678-R2 on it.
> 
> Odd multiples of 1/4 coax between duplexer tees and the antenna tee?
> 
> BTW: A big thanks to Skipp, Phil and the rest who've jumped in here  
> today. I sometimes get some crazy notions (ham guy, not commercial 2- 
> way shop here) and I really appreciate this group. I lurk a lot and  
> learn a lot -- only hope I can give back more someday.
> 
> 73 DE N0MJS
> 
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 5:08 PM, skipp025 wrote:
> 
> >
> > Seen and done this before...
> >
> > Two Motorola T-1500 type duplexers, one setup on each repeater
> > along with the proper tx circulator for each. The antenna port of
> > both duplexers joined with another coax T... if you want to be
> > really on the money use a n-way and remove the two duplexer
> > output T's.
> >
> > If the reflected power on the antennas is minimal the system
> > should play just fine. I've seen it done at more than one commercial
> > repeater site. The frequencies are far enough from each other
> > that everything should play just fine.
> >
> > cheers,
> > s.
> >
> > > Cort Buffington <cort@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > I've found a site for my most recent Ham repeater project. Nice farm
> > > tower on a hill, clean of RF colo, etc. The farm repeater is a  
> > 463.xxx
> > > + machine and I'm on 444.825. It is set up with nice hardline and  
> > a 16
> > > bay folded dipole antenna (not sure the mfg., but he thinks it's  
> > DB).
> > > Anyway, assuming that thing has useable SWR on my TX frequency (I've
> > > had that happen before, not holding my breath), does anyone have any
> > > ideas about the viability of running both repeaters on the same
> > > antenna but connecting the duplexer outputs together in to the  
> > common
> > > feedline? I've done no math, and not a lot of thinking, but is this
> > > one of those times when I might run odd multiples of 1/4 wave coax  
> > to
> > > a T at the hardline or something? Both repeaters have BpBr duplexers
> > > and both have isolators on their outputs.
> > >
> > > 73 DE N0MJS
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cort Buffington
> > > H: +1-785-838-3034
> > > M: +1-785-865-7206
> > >
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> --
> Cort Buffington
> H: +1-785-838-3034
> M: +1-785-865-7206
>

Reply via email to