Tom,
Thanks for the reply. I was going to do TX and RX in the same box. But 
now??? I can get the Mitrek RX to work but the TX is dead. I think it 
is set up for too high of a frequency to be able to tune down to 
144mhz. There are about 16 caps which I could change to get the TX 
changed to the low split. I may have to go that way. Please tell me 
more about the Syntor. Is it doable for a repeater?
Thanks, Collin


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:46 am
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] need Mitrek






May be hard to get one on that split. I know Canada used to use Micor's 
on
the low split, maybe some of our northern friends may know where some 
are.

Used to be a company named Spantek in Hamilton Ontario that had a bunch 
of
commercial radios on the low split for sale.

Have you thought about using a Syntor X. They work great on two meters 
and
can be had for the price of one or two crystals.

What do you need a receiver or transmitter or are you trying to do both 
in
the same box?

tom

> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 2/25/2008 11:20:47 PM
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] need Maitre
>
>
> Dear List Members,
> I am working on a 2 meter repeater using a Maitre mobile. Well I need
> to get one that works first. HA. The VHF high band high split will 
not
> work down low enough. I need a low split VHF high band Maitre mobile.
> Anything? Please let me know.
> Thanks, Collin
>
> __________________________________________________________
> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
> http://webmail.aol.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVGAS Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.9/1292 - Release Date:
2/21/2008 4:09 PM





________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com

Reply via email to