Thanks to all who have responded to my control-receiver question and my through-the-cabinet question. This includes at least Laryn, Ron, Bob, Adam, Paul, and Al.
I think I know how to proceed now. I'll start looking for the proper connectors and cables. Thanks again, John AF4PD -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Wright Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Adding Control Receiver without Separate Antenna I would recommend not using a 12.5 kHz spacing freq in this case of a control receiever, a receiver that is only 12.5 kHz away from your regular repeater input. With typical good FM analog receivers these would both have overlapping passbands and an input signal on the repeater input would interfer with the control input. With som many using IC type DTMF decoders any interference, just over lapping distorted voice would hender the decoder decoding. A typical UHF duplexer would have a notch wide enough for a freq +/-25 kHz away. Know this is going to be another repeaters input, but with some research could find is close in distance to you. I have used control UHF freq that are 6.25 kHz spacing, but these were in the 446 range and on separate antenna. Just had access to this. I used this freq to give some added security. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome. On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Laryn Lohman wrote: --- In Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:[email protected]> yahoogroups. com, "John Transue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .> wrote: > > Laryn K8TVZ, > > So, if I understand, I should put a splitter after the pre-amp, and > the control frequency should be a split channel. Does this mean that I > use half way between two channels? Right, one of the 12.5 kc. in-between channels would be less likely to have something on them. > > Another question, who makes a good splitter, and how can I know I am > getting a good splitter? Well, I've seen 50 ohm splitters quite often at hamfests. I don't have a good brand name to point you to. I am, however, using a 75 ohm TV splitter. Purists will hate this, but especially, if you are after a preamp, I don't see this as a big deal. It works just fine here with no measured loss in repeater receiver sensitivity through the system. Use quality coax and fittings. I've found that RG142 works reasonably well with the TV splitters since it has a solid center conductor. If you are not using a preamp, then you really need to do things right, using a proper splitter, and still you may lose some sensitivity. Some of you are saying, where's the quality in that splitter scheme? Well, experimentally I've found it works well here, so after initial measurements showed me that things were still the same, I'll tend to stay with what works, but ready to ditch the whole thing if needed and go another route. Sometimes <quality> takes the form of performance, not looks or perfection. If system sensitivity had suffered it wouldn't be there for more than 15 minutes. Laryn K8TVZ <mailto:[email protected]> __________ NOD32 2918 (20080303) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com
