Thanks for the clarification.

And you managed to say it with words less than a foot
high.

I'm the trustee for a club, and one of these days I
might put that callsign on one of my repeaters. There
are plenty of club callsigns on repeaters out here.

Bob M.
======
--- Paul Plack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Guys, a "trustee" in FCC licensing terms is someone
> other than the licensee who agrees to be responsible
> for the legal operation of a transmitter.
> 
> Back in the days when the FCC required a repeater to
> be licensed separately with its own callsign, the
> person responsible for its operation was a
> "trustee," because a club or other party was the
> licensee. When they did away with separate repeater
> licenses, there was no more need for trustees.
> 
> If your callsign is on the repeater, you are the
> licensee, not the trustee.
> 
> Similarly, on Field Day, if a bunch of guys get
> together and use the callsign of the group's only
> extra-class licensee as the station callsign for
> everyone operating, the guy who holds that callsign
> is the station licensee, not a trustee. If it's a
> club with a club callsign separate from any of the
> individuals, then someone must be a trustee for it.
> 
> Are there any repeaters left using club callsigns?
> If so, those would be the only repeaters which still
> have trustees.
> 
> Paul, AE4KR
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Ron Wright 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:04 AM
>   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
> 
> 
> 
>   > Huh? ALL repeaters MUST have a license
> trustee!!! What ever callsign it 
>   > ID's with is the trustee, whether club or not. 
> 
> 
> 
>   I agree each license has a trustee and only a
> person can be a trustee.  A club can own I guess one
> can say a callsign and a designated officer of the
> club can desingate the trustee.
> 
> 
>   However, I thought we were talking about repeaters
> and stations, not callsigns.  The station or
> repeater does not have to use the trustee's
> callsign.  Maybe I reading it wrong.
> 
> 
>   73, ron, n9ee/r
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Ron Wright, N9EE
> 
> 
>   727-376-6575
> 
> 
>   MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
> 
> 
>   Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
> 
> 
>   No tone, all are welcome.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:39 PM, wd8chl wrote:
> 
> 
>   Ron Wright wrote: 
>   > 
>   > I'm not sure the callsign of the repeater is the
> trustee.  I as a 
>   > trustee of my ham station can have another ham
> use my station using 
>   > their callsign.  If operating outside their
> license, but within mine 
>   > they must include my call with theirs, but if
> repeater is operating 
>   > within say a Tech's license freq, but I am the
> trustee then the repeater 
>   > can ID with their call. 
>   > 
>   > All Ham Stations must have a trustee, but not
> necessarily ID with it. 
>   > 
>   > If a violation is sited both the trustee and the
> call being used can be 
>   > held responsible.  Same with control ops. 
>   > 
>   > As with a club call there is a trustee, but the
> call is of the club. 
>   > Just the trustee has agreed to allow use of
> whatever station; HF, 
>   > repeater, etc. 
>   > 
> 
> 
>   Yikes...look up a ham call sign on the FCC ULS web
> site...the PERSON 
>   listed (there will ALWAYS be a person) IS the
> license trustee...ALWAYS! !!!! 
> 
> 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:19 AM, wd8chl wrote: 
>   > 
>   > Bob M. wrote: 
>   > 
>   >> Regarding trustees: club stations certainly
> need one. I think it's 
>   >> just customary even for privately owned
> repeaters to have trustees, 
>   >> even if it's in name only, and it could
> certainly be the station 
>   >> owner, but it doesn't have to be. A repeater
> could be owned by a 
>   >> novice (who couldn't use it) but an extra class
> person could be the 
>   >> trustee. 
>   > 
>   > __/ 
>   > o_O 
>   > 
>   > Huh? ALL repeaters MUST have a license
> trustee!!! What ever callsign it 
>   > ID's with is the trustee, whether club or not. 
>   > 
>   > It's only a matter of whether the license is
> valid or not... 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >


      

Reply via email to