Tom, its really a matter of productivity. Doing something as a hobby is one thing, and you do learn more by doing it yourself and then finding out how to really do it right, but that sure does not cut it if you are in a commercial environment.
I started as a circuit designer and after 10 years, I supervised 4 groups of 5 engineers each, and one thing I did was lean on my folks to discuss problems with their piers to find a faster and less complicated solution to a particular job. I found my 4 supervisers very quickly as the folks who interacted with others in the groups and tried to help with any problems that came up. When I shifted to Systems Engineering, I knew right off the bat that the guys to listen to for designing a system that will work are the guys that are going to have to build it. A free exchange of information that leads to a design to fit a goal with the fewest pitfalls in the implementation is the most reliable way to success. I tend to view repeater building the same way. Listen to the folks who have been there and done that. Even though I have been building repeaters since the early 1970s (WR5ADU and WR5ADV) I can say that I have learned a lot about repeaters on this list and from the repeater builder site. I feel free to plagerize any design or idea that will help my project - HI. The NIH (Not Invented Here) way of thinking is a sure fire way to make your efforts much more difficult. 73 - Jim W5ZIT --- On Sun, 7/20/08, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: just thinking To: [email protected] Date: Sunday, July 20, 2008, 12:29 AM This is not to minimize Repeater-Builder and other good sites that are a tremendous resource of information that would be difficult, or impossible, to obtain in times past; however having the answer to most every obstacle takes some of the fun and challenge out of the process. It's almost become a "cookbook" experience. Having to scrounge all over He??'s half acre for answers to the obstacle at hand was part of the challenge and resulted in an enormous sense of accomplishment when the answer finally was found. Yeah it's easy and more sure, but a lot of the "mystery" is gone. Just my 2cents. Tom --- In Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com, Jim Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Amen to that !!! 40 years ago would have been even better - (if there had been an internet) > > 73 - Jim W5ZIT
