> "Bob M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The people in charge of the repeater 25 kHz away (and on 
> the opposite split) DID contact the guy in charge of the 
> over-deviating repeater. 

Excellente'

> He turned down some of the audio sources, again with no 
> test equipment, 

Just in the interest of realistic time savings... I'd go over 
with my Service Monitor ready to do the work with/for 
him/her/them. If he turned down the audio sources it means 
he can be civil (a basic minimal requirement), which is a 
big plus. Put on the red cape or spider-man suit and show 
up as test equipment "Super Repeater Guy". As a bit of advise 
if possible avoid the brown and salmon super-guy suit color 
schemes. 

> but the lack of pre-emphasis/limiting/low-pass-filtering 
> in the transmitter still exists, and signals with a high 
> noise level wreak havoc.

You don't have to have all the above items in place to have 
a civil signal on the air... Much of the grief I run into is 
related to levels in excess, often great excess. If the guy 
will let you help him out... help him out. 

> Definitely time to "bump it up a notch" by going to the 
> coordinating body to get some pressure put on this guy.

In my opinion... only in extreme cases... 

> He was into the hard rock stuff in the 80s and his hearing 
> has been poor since then.

At least the makeup came off... can't easily get rid of the 
x-rated tattoo. 

> Bob M. 

cheers, 
s.  

Reply via email to