--- In [email protected], "Jacob Suter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Are these units plugged into the same circuit?  I'm guessing the 
wireless
> internet gear installed has a dirty power supply or a large amount 
of
> vhf-band noise being pushed back down.

Yes, they are on the same circuit.  The unit is installed out in my 
repeater building.  


> 
> A lot of cheap wall-wart power supplies (or cheap Chinese 'project'
> supplies) are crap.  This is getting surprisingly common - even the
> cigarette lighter charger for my cellphone spews crap all over the 
VHF and
> FM broadcast band.

I agree, I will have to look and see what the voltage is and see if I 
can power it from another source and try that.

> 
> I do wireless internet installs for a living, and you'd be 
surprised the
> general lack of quality control is used on most gear.  I'm curious -
 what
> gear was installed?
> 

I am not sure the name of it.  The only reference I have is Canopy.

Mathew


> JS
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:Repeater-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n9lv
> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:16 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 2.4 Ghz wireless radio and 145.410 
repeater
> > 
> > I just had a 2.4 Ghz internet wireless antenna mounted at the top 
of my
> > 120' tower which is where the antenna is for the 145.410 
repeater.  I
> > am getting intermod into the system that causes it to hang open.
> > 
> > Anyone ever had these issues and how did you go about remeding the
> > problem.  And I can't shut off the internet as the family would 
hang
> > me, and would rather not shut off the repeater.
> > 
> > There is besides the TXRX duplexers two DB4001 filter duplexers 
on the
> > system.  Funny part is that once it starts the interference, I can
> > remove antenna from the receiver and it continues to intermod 
until I
> > kill the transmitter.  I can hit the remote PTT and it will key 
the
> > repeater, no noise into the system until I reattach the antenna 
port to
> > the receiver.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Mathew
>


Reply via email to