With the reedless board chip being nothing more then a simple resister network, 
I wonder what your purity results might be if you built-up a 127.3 network 
using 1, 5,and 10% 1/8w resisters for comparison as well. 
--
Doug   
N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709

---- Eric Lemmon <[email protected]> wrote: 

=============
I recently acquired a Kenwood HM-250 Audio Distortion Analyzer, and I have
been experimenting with various CTCSS tone encoders to find which produce
the purest tones.  Since I am putting together a 6m repeater using Mitrek
radios, I wanted to compare the older HLN4020B reed board to the newer
HLN4181A reedless board.  What an eye-opener!

At the outset, my gut feeling was that the reed board would produce a purer
tone than the digital reedless board, since the reeds are essentially tuning
forks.  That turned out to be a false assumption.

With two known-good tone boards hooked up on the bench, the 4020B reed board
consistently produced a 127.3 Hz tone with distortion ranging from 0.75% to
1.52%, while the 4181A reedless board produced the same tone with only 0.43%
distortion.  I adjusted the output level pot (R23) on the 4181A board to
match the output level of the 4020B board.  I tested the 4020B board with
six 127.3 Hz reeds.

Another interesting fact emerged from my experiment:  Although the PL tone
reeds can be plugged into their sockets in either of two positions, I found
that there was definitely a difference in the amount of distortion produced.
The differences ranged from 0.1% up to 0.6%- not much, but surprising, since
the reeds are supposedly symmetrical.  I got similar results with KLN6209A,
KLN6210A, and TLN6824A reeds.

For comparison, I measured the distortion at 127.3 Hz from several pieces of
test equipment, with the following results:

HP 204B Audio Generator:  0.24%
Motorola R2600D Service Monitor:  0.26%
Wavetek 188 Audio Generator:  0.19%
CSI TE-64D Tone Generator:  0.76%

My next step is to evaluate the purity of the CTCSS tones after passing
through an RF link.  Some radios- cheap ones especially- use rather coarse
tone synthesis techniques to generate PL tones, and the resulting tones are
prone to falsing and talk-off problems.  Stay tuned...

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


Reply via email to