Ok, the Elmer fully retuned the Mastr2 mid power repeater on Sunday and has
it tuned for roughly 26 watts out of the P/A... This is a 40 watt P/A. What
will this station typically draw current-wise? Right now it's fed off of a
30 amp supply (major overkill) but we'd like to have a rough idea on amp
draw to calculate standby time off of batteries.

Thanks!

-AJ, K6LOR

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:45 AM, AJ <[email protected]> wrote:

> Charles:
>
> Any idea what your current draw was when you had it tuned down to 10 watts?
>
> I've been doing the alignment directly off of the exciter (250 mw off of
> the RCA jack on the drawer) but the power output doesn't match the needs of
> the mobile usage.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 73s,
> AJ, K6LOR
>
>   On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Ham-Radio <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>    AJ,
>>
>> You asked what is the lowest power level for the Mastr2 radio. I had taken
>> a 250 Watt base and turned it down to 10 Watts out for testing purposes with
>> out generating any spurs.
>>
>> However, If I remember to documents say to not run the poweer any lower
>> than 50% of rated power out.
>>
>> Remember, you can use only the driver if you need low power out.
>>
>> Charles Miller
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *AJ
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:04 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] GE Master II Pa decks
>>
>>   With regard to the Intermittent Duty 50 watt Stations, what is the
>> lowest these will tune down to without excessive spurs?
>>
>> I have a Mastr2 VHF station we're looking at placing in our command
>> trailer for temporary operations - AC power most of the time, but would like
>> to have it draw as little power as possible (within reason) for times when
>> working on battery power only. 250 mw off the exciter just isn't enough, 65
>> watts out of the P/A is just too much.
>>
>>
>> 73s,
>>
>> AJ, K6LOR/R
>> 147.080+
>> 444.750+
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Nate Duehr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>   An isolator with appropriate harmonic filtering AFTER it (they create
>>> harmonics, which are not friendly to your neighbors), presents a nice
>>> solid
>>> non-reactive 50 ohm load to the transmitter. It doesn't matter if it's a
>>> GE
>>> MASTR II PA, or someone elses. Many Motorola PA's have the isolator built
>>> in, for example.
>>>
>>> The GE PA likes a 50 ohm load or it tends to do squirrelly things, like
>>> die.
>>> You can get this by proper choice of QUALITY products for your
>>> filtering/feedline/antenna system, or you can use an isolator, or you can
>>> have the "belt and suspenders" mentality and always run an isolator on
>>> the
>>> output of the PA. Another good reason to do this at high RF commercial
>>> sites is that the PA (depending on how you may have modified it) has
>>> transistors in the final section that are "always on", thus... mixing can
>>> occur in the PA if RF from the outside world can get down INTO the PA
>>> from
>>> elsewhere. Also not a nice thing for your neighbors.
>>>
>>> The final "benefit" to a properly sized dummy load on your isolator is
>>> that
>>> the antenna can literally fall off the tower, and the PA will still be
>>> driving into a solid 50 ohm dummy load. As long as that load is the
>>> correct
>>> size for your PA's power level, no damage to the PA will occur, even
>>> though
>>> your antenna is gone.
>>>
>>> Some late-model MASTR II PA's have built in Z-matchers on their output
>>> Low-Pass Filter board on the right lower side. These have to be adjusted
>>> correctly per the manual any time a new PA is installed on a new antenna
>>> system, or anything changes in the antenna system. Older PA's do not have
>>> this feature, but an off-board Z-matcher can be added in lieu of an
>>> isolator
>>> if all you're concerned about is matching the source (PA) to the load
>>> (antenna system).
>>>
>>> The GE PA comes in different sizes for different power level needs. The
>>> VHF
>>> 100W (original with four final driver transistors) was known to get
>>> spurious
>>> and throw stuff up and down the band for various reasons. The newer
>>> three-final-transistor PA's (the most commonly seen) are less prone to do
>>> this, but can also become RF noisemakers if turned down too much. No
>>> MASTR
>>> II tech I know of will recommend turning any MASTR II PA any further down
>>> than roughly 2/3's its maximum rated power output, ESPECIALLY not without
>>> looking at it on a spectrum analyzer to make sure it's not spurring. When
>>> they go spurious, which is rare enough people get away with turning the
>>> PA's
>>> down more than 2/3's, they also typically overheat drastically and
>>> they'll
>>> destroy themselves relatively quickly.
>>>
>>> If you need less power than 50W it's highly recommended to remove stages
>>> of
>>> the PA to get to the lower power level you need, bypassing them
>>> completely,
>>> or moving to a lower power/lower-duty-cycle PA in the model line.
>>>
>>> Done right, even after 20 years of commercial service, the VHF MASTR II
>>> PA
>>> will happily sit there and put out 85W all day long, without batting an
>>> eyelash. Many will still do a strong 110W and never care, either. It's
>>> just a little "easier" on the gear to run the power back just a little
>>> bit.
>>> The difference (in dB) between 85W and 110W often isn't significant,
>>> depending on your area you're wanting to cover.
>>>
>>> Why are you wanting to turn your MASTR II back so far? After duplexer
>>> losses, you're down to roughly 20W if you're putting 45W into a duplexer
>>> (if
>>> you're running split antenna, with no duplexer and vertical separation,
>>> nevermind -- but I doubt you are), and 20W doesn't "balance" well with
>>> 50W
>>> mobiles. If you're trying to balance for HT coverage only, I could see it
>>> maybe...
>>>
>>> My personal rule for the MASTR II PA's is: Set 'em to 85W and forget 'em.
>>> Put an isolator on for ALL of the good reasons for an isolator, filter it
>>> properly, and forget about it. The vast majority of them will run for 10
>>> or
>>> more years without touching them again after doing that.
>>>
>>> Look carefully at the Repeater-Builder company specifications -- you may
>>> be
>>> looking at a MASTR II *MOBILE* rig converted into a repeater. That's NOT
>>> a
>>> MASTR II Repeater PA. They're de-rating the PA to save it from
>>> overheating
>>> and dying, as it's not rated for 100% continuous duty at full power in
>>> the
>>> mobile rig with the small heatsink. The MASTR II REPEATER PA is a giant
>>> heavy thing with plenty of heatsink fins, 19" wide and multiple RU tall,
>>> that is EIA rated to do continuous-duty cycle at 110W for at least 24
>>> hours.
>>>
>>> Nate WY0X
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> [mailto:[email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>]
>>> On Behalf Of Randy
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 8:24 AM
>>> To: [email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] GE Master II Pa decks
>>>
>>> Hi group whats the deal with the GE Master II PA decks needing to use a
>>> ferrite isolator with a 50 ohm dummy load and a low pass filter between
>>> the PA and the High Q duplexer. Is this something that most do with
>>> the 75 and 100 w Pa's We just replaced one in a Master II Mobile radio
>>> which lasted for years with no issues. After installing the PA and
>>> doing a tune up the Radio did about 80 watts we set it to 45 watts I
>>> was also told that was not a good thing to do so whats the story on the
>>> PA. I seen where Repeater Builder the Company talks about the 75 or 100
>>> watt PA's in there web site only bening good set to 45 watts or so
>>> anyway so I assume they are setting theres at that level when they do a
>>> Duplex conversion ect making the radio into a repeater. I have read the
>>> information on the website about this but would like some user comments
>>> as well. Also where would one get the needed parts ect to do this Mod.
>>>
>>> Randy
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>  
>>
>
>

Reply via email to