I don't know the RLC controller per se'. If it has a voter panel in it I'd say ok.
If you don't have a voter panel I'd say the idea is very "iffy". You don't want the same rcv audio being summed from two different sources unless you take very special precautions. If those precautions are not employed, you will have distortions & echos. Problem #1: Unless you incorporate an adaptive delay into each audio path, you'll have audio arriving out of sync from the various rcvrs. This is where your echos will come from. Problem #2: Your audio will probably comprise unequal freq responses due the different rcvr & link characteristics. You'll need to "equalize" the audio paths so they sound the same no matter which source is feeding the main tx. About the only way your idea can work w/o all the extra devices is if the two (or more) audio sources were never live simultaneously. Other than the last scenario, you'll have your work cut out for you in the attempt to make it sound decent. Just my thoughts on the matter. --- In [email protected], Rick Szajkowski <va3r...@...> wrote: > > Question for the group > > The repeater is on the out side of town .. coverage in town is ok > but could be a lot better TX is GREAT > Idea .. can I put a RX (vhf ) site in town and piggy back that to > a UHF radio and then feed that into a RLC controller to be linked > to the main repeater port or will that cause problems ? > > I just want to bring up the 'handi' coverage in the down town core > > I have access to a roof top that will do what I want to .. > > any Ideas ? > > Thanks > > Rick
