THats what happens when I dont wear my glasses.. I thought he said LMR400.. 142 is Good.. I still prefer superflex.
--- On Sat, 3/14/09, Chuck Kelsey <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Chuck Kelsey <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater Power Amp > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, March 14, 2009, 10:29 AM > RG-400 is the same as RG-142 except has a stranded center. > It's not crap. LMR400 is crap, but that's not what > he said. > > Chuck > WB2EDV > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: neal Newman > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 9:23 AM > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater Power Amp > > > Get Rid of that crap cable your using.. > I only use RG 214, and or superflex for my > inter connects between the repeater, amps in line(power > amp/preamps), and the duplexer. Mosly 1/4" superflex > becuase I got lots of it. In a pinch I will use RG-142... > Never use that 400 or 9913 garbage.. > > --- On Sat, 3/14/09, Michael Ryan > <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Michael Ryan > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater > Power Amp > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, March 14, 2009, 12:47 AM > > > That’s the model I am using now. I have some > other issues to study before changing to another amp. But > hearing that someone is using this same amp is encouraging. > Like I said though, I have to check into the actual tuning > of the transmitter to see if I have done something that is > creating my problem. For those interested, the cables in > the rack are all RG-400, no 9913 or clones, no LMR > stuff...nothing else. Duplexer is Telewave 4 cans, RG-214 > cabled, ½” Andrew hardline to the antenna. > > -Mike > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger > White > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 5:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater > Power Amp > > > > I ran a Mirage C2512G (s/n 30820) for a number of > years at a reduced Pout (around 75 watts out of duplexer) > and had no problems. The amp case is mounted on a very large > heat sink for repeater use. Its only glitch was a nearby > lightening strike that vaporized the output cap of the PA. > Replaced the cap but never put it back on line as most users > never noticed it wasn't there. > > > > Roger W5RDW > > 224.18 MHz Dallas > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Michael Ryan > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:12 PM > > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater > Power Amp > > > > I’ve had several users indicate that they are > using TE Systems Amps in repeater service. I have one of > the OLDER Mirage amps, I think it has been around here for > 12 or more years at least, perhaps more. This SHOULD be > pre-MFJ. My model is 25 in for 120 out. I planned to run > 10 watts or so in for 75 or so out. Is this a reasonable > choice? - Mike > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Michael Ryan > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:51 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 220 Repeater Power > Amp > > Does anyone have some advice about what to use > for a power amp in a 220 repeater? MIRAGE makes a 90 watt > model they claim is for repeater service. I don’t see > anything else around. I’d be happy with 60 – 90 watts > MAX output with maybe 10-20 watts drive. – Thanks.. - > Mike > > > > > __________ NOD32 3935 (20090313) Information > __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus > system. > http://www.eset.com > > > > > __________ NOD32 3935 (20090313) Information > __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus > system. > http://www.eset.com
