And once you do get a voter you can leave the unique PLs in
place as a diagnostic system.  It's mentioned here:
<http://www.repeater-builder.com/tech-info/votingcomparators.html>

Mike WA6ILQ


At 10:50 AM 04/15/09, you wrote:

>Many systems will use a different PL for different receive sites to 
>get around the need for a voter. It requires more education for the 
>users to know where they are & which receiver they get into better, 
>but its a simple setup that works.
>
>Tom
>W9SRV
>
>
>--- On Wed, 4/15/09, John Transue <jtran...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > From: John Transue <jtran...@cox.net>
> > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Remote Receiver
> > To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2009, 12:45 PM
> > Lance, Mark, Cort, Butch, Bob, Chris, and others,
> >
> > Thanks for the good advice and quick response. I will
> > follow up on the
> > suggestions, and get an idea of the cost.
> >
> > It hadn't occurred to me that I would need a voter.
> > With only this one
> > remote receiver, I thought I could just rely on the
> > controller (ACC
> > RC-850) to accept the audio in accordance with the -850
> > priorities. Is
> > this not suitable?
> >
> > I have a UHF Mastr II. I guess one approach would be to
> > swap out the
> > receiver for a VHF receiver and use the UHF as the link.
> > One of you has
> > done this with good result.
> >
> > I also have an ACC RC-85 controller. I could use this with
> > a VHF RX, a
> > UHF TX, and have a UHF RX at the base.
> >
> > Does the link TX have to identify (amateur service)? I
> > believe it does
> > have to. Is there a way to avoid having extra IDs when the
> > link is
> > active? Well, I guess once every ten minutes isn't much
> > of a problem.
> >
> > Thanks again. More suggestions are welcome.
> >
> > John Transue AF4PD
> >
> >
> > >
> > >__________ NOD32 4010 (20090415) Information __________
> > >
> > >This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > >http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Reply via email to