Still, I fail to see how a national list is less effective than a local 
list. Local lists are fine for local discussions, but cannot take the 
place of a national list. Maybe SCAROA should host a RB list, too???

BTW, the "having gone to a website" comment and URL you made AFTER I 
asked the question THEN berating me for not going to the website is 
hardly fair or honest. I think I see who is really tapping here. You're 
trying to take RB discussions away from the RB lists.

The RBC list is the official list for coordination discussions that 
would otherwise be on THIS list - like it or not, that's the way it is. 
There are also dozens if not hundreds of other local coordination lists, 
so please don't try to promote one of them as being 'the' place for all 
coordination discussions. There is an official list for such 
discussions, and I posted it. If you don't like the lists Kevin runs, 
there are unsubscription links on all of them.

Joe M.

raffertysec wrote:
> Having gone to the web site you'd have found that it is the Southern 
> California Amateur Repeater Owners Association :) Creating a subset list 
> below this only spreads conversations here and there. http://scaroa.org has 
> been around longer than the sublist or the new Google list. Please note that 
> I didn't bring this issue here, but when I read a tap dance I had to reply.
> 
> --- In [email protected], MCH <m...@...> wrote:
>> The list is a subset of this list, and again, was created to keep 
>> coordination discussions off this list. What is SCAROA anyway?
>>
>> Joe M.
>>
>> raffertysec wrote:
>>> Why duplicate the efforts? SCAROA has long existed.
>>>
>>> --- In [email protected], MCH <mch@> wrote:
>>>> The list owner created 
>>>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder-Coordination/> for 
>>>> coordination issues related to building repeaters. This was done 
>>>> specifically to keep coordination issues off *this* list.
>>>>
>>>> Joe M.
>>>>
>>>> raffertysec wrote:
>>>>> I will also disagree in that building a repeater involves coordination 
>>>>> and this thread IS relevent to the ham in southern California.
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In [email protected], "Mike Mullarkey" <k7pfj@> wrote:
>>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I really don't care to hear about your issues with the coordinating body 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> who likes or dis likes Shorty and his system, if you really know him he 
>>>>>> is a
>>>>>> very generous person. Let's be done with this. I would hope that Skip and
>>>>>> others would agree this thread is not about building repeaters or trying 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> figure out how to build one. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No dis-respect, but you guys should keep the coordinating board business 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> internal email. It does not look good when everyone all over the world 
>>>>>> sees
>>>>>> how the coordinating body acts like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike Mullarkey K7PFJ
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
>>>>> Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.12.21/2102 - Release Date: 
>>>>> 05/07/09 05:57:00
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.12.21/2103 - Release Date: 05/07/09 
> 18:05:00
> 

Reply via email to