I'm again posting this information here because of the fair 
number of direct Emails I get related to the Alexander 
Battery Optimizer requests for charger pocket/adapter info. 

Alexander Battery Optimizer follow-up per a series of group 
posts made last December. I've accumulated a fair list of the 
Optimizer Pockets and their associated calibration resistor 
values. In Email conversations with a number of persons a 
formula for the resistor value was worked out as follows: 

"Take the battery voltage and times it by 71.5 and that will 
give you the value of the resistor." Kent M. has reported to 
have tested the analyzer from 6 to 12 volts and in between.

(Kent M. is the source of the estimated reference resistor 
formula, thank you Kent). 

In addition to the resistor formula... I now have a zip file 
of pocket/adapter model numbers. The resistor values for those 
pockets does pretty much jive with the formula. If you would 
like a copy of the information, please feel free to direct 
email me.  If your Email service doesn't allow zip file 
attachments... I can send you the same file with the suffix 
name changes from .zip to .skp and you simply rename it 
before extraction (un-zipping). 

that is all... 

cheers, 
skipp 

skipp025 at yahoo.com 


> "skipp025" <skipp...@...> wrote:
>
> : "del7734" <brhb@> wrote:
> : Hi Skipp, any luck with a manual ? looking for BK pocket 
> : part number and any other info. might have to build a pocket 
> : but I dont know the resistor value for a 10vdc batt. 
> : Thanks Del
> 
> Hi Del, 
> 
> Well... yes and no. There's quite a story behind the Alexander 
> Optimizer units. 
> 
> Trying to be brief... 
> 
> There is not much help on/for the original Optimizer units. When 
> NiMH and Lith-Ion battery packs hit the scene the early units 
> were not designed to properly handle/deal with the new battery 
> technology. 
> 
> So I "assume" from my fairly recent conversations with a guy 
> at Alexander they simply discontinued that line because because 
> of a number of over-charging train-wrecks regarding folks using 
> non Ni-Cad batteries in these early battery optimizer units. 
> 
> The replacement revised battery charger conditioners should clearly 
> be labeled as "New Generation". Otherwise you probably have the 
> NiCad only Optimizer unit, which are still quite usable for 
> what they are. 
> 
> If you'd like to charge only Ni-Cad batteries in an Optimizer 
> then it's hopefully a matter of only finding the proper pockets 
> for your specific battery. 
> 
> Based on my recent research... I've learned each specific pocket 
> has an included (attached) resistor, which sets the parameters 
> for that pockets' battery type.  One could construct a custom 
> pocket if you were able to figure out a desired resistor value. 
> 
> Hence the rub... 
> 
> So I started making a list of the various charger pockets and 
> any pocket resistor values I was able to obtain/measure. It 
> would be nice if others were able to add data to the table based 
> on pockets they might be able to access and measure (the resistor 
> value) easy enough. 
> 
> You are welcome to a copy of the pocket - resistor - battery 
> model data sheet information I've made by simply emailing me 
> direct and requesting said animal. With enough decent information 
> and some smart guess work there should be no reason why you 
> can't construct a custom pocket for your needs. 
> 
> The early Alexander Battery Optimizers were expensive and fairly 
> useful for/with NiCad batteries (only). I wasn't able to find a 
> copy of the Optimizer Manual but someday maybe one will turn up. 
> In the mean time I'm able to use the one I have for/on some battery 
> types... maybe you can do the same using what information we 
> have available. 
> 
> cheers, 
> skipp 
> 
> skipp025 at yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> > > "skipp025" <skipp025@> wrote:
> > > Hello groovy guys and gals, 
> > > I picked up an Alexander Batteries Optimizer (4 pocket model) 
> > > last weekend at the local ham flea market. I also see a number 
> > > of similar models on ebay cheap enough. 
> > >
>


Reply via email to