The point has been made that a closed repeater (actually any repeater) is 
private property and others have no right to utilize it.  I would agree to that 
premise except for the fact that the repeater utilizes PUBLIC spectrum.

The analogy would be: I have a large tent that I like to set up on my property. 
 If I take that same tent and permanently set it up in a public park and, I 
keep others from entering my tent, I am using PUBLIC property for my own, 
exclusive use.  Would that set well with most of you?

I have a closed repeater that has PUBLIC spectrum coordinated for it.  That has 
the effect of allocating that PUBLIC asset for my exclusive use.

Why should a repeater be different than the tent?

Reply via email to