Dave,

Actually, it's a good idea for all Amateur repeaters in a geographic area to
use the same CTCSS tone.  With very few exceptions, all 6m, 2m, 220, and 440
repeaters in Santa Barbara County use 131.8 Hz.  We don't have interference
problems, and it makes it easy for travelers to contact local Hams.  Many
repeaters with voice ID announce the PL tone as well.

There is a potential problem with more than one repeater at a site sharing
the same PL tone, if they are the same make and model.  For example, Santa
Barbara County had more than a dozen Micor repeaters and base stations at
one mountaintop site, and all had 82.5 Hz tones.  Even with complicated
multicoupler and combiner systems in place, there were instances of
interference between them.  Once the unrelated systems were given different
PL tones, the problems went away.  One of the issues with Micor stations is
that exciter leakage can occur if all of the shield plates are not
reinstalled, with every screw tight.  There were also a few instances of
leakage from an exciter in one UHF station leaking into an adjacent VHF
station, since the UHF station uses a VHF exciter that is then tripled.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of WA3GIN
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 6:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Nearby Repeaters

  

Looking for opinions.  
 
Our club has a couple of 2m repeaters; we chose to run them with PL and we
picked 107.2 because that tone freq. was not in use in the area.  Recently
two other clubs who also have 2m repeaters have decided to utilze the same
PL tone freq.  
 
Does having numerous repeaters PL'd with the same tone freq. increase the
probability of the normally generated intermod/mixed signal to now carry
within the produced signal  a correct  PL tone that may land on the input
freq. of another local repeater?  Is it considered a bad practice to utilize
the same PL for numerous repeaters in the same band all located within a few
miles of each other?
 
Thanks,
dave
wa3gin



Reply via email to