Maybe he is mickysoft trained and hence a little slow ?

To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:12:39 -0700
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] stitching schematics together















 




    
                  If it is so easy to use and works so well, I wonder why 
National

Geographic's editors don't know about it...



73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 



-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]

[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of A.Tahir DENGIZ

Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:39 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] stitching schematics together



Dear Friends,

 

I suggest you to use the software (Freeware) named "autostitch".

It is very easy to use it and you can stitch 2 or more pictures-schematics

etc.

Just Google and download.

 

A.Tahir DENGIZ, TA2T



--- On Wed, 9/2/09, Eric Lemmon <[email protected]> wrote:



        From: Eric Lemmon <[email protected]>

        Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] stitching schematics together

        To: [email protected]

        Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2009, 5:21 AM

        

        

          

        Randy,

        

        Although "stitching" sounds really simple, it is hardly so. Many

scanners

        are not completely linear, because the area near each end of the

scan is

        distorted a little. When you attempt to "cut and paste" two segments

of a

        larger original together, you find that you can never get all of the

fine

        details to line up at the junction. A perfect example of this

optical

        aberration is shown on pages 90-91 of the July 2009 issue of

National

        Geographic. A panoramic photo was made up of three images from the

same

        camera, taken only seconds apart, but there is obvious misalignment

between

        the edges of each image.

        

        My hat is off to you for intending to scan large pages in one shot.

I think

        you'll find that it's a heckuva lot cheaper to pay a graphics shop

to scan

        large images, than it is to buy (and then learn to use) Adobe

Photoshop. I

        do own Photoshop, but I have neither the patience nor the

inclination to

        spend a lot of time and energy manipulating segments of schematics

when I

        can get a large page scanned in one pass for less than a dollar.

        

        73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

        

        

        -----Original Message-----

        From: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> 

        [mailto:Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> ] On Behalf Of R.K. Brumback

        Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:32 PM

        To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> 

        Subject: [Repeater-Builder] stitching schematics together

        

        Thanks Eric! I will probably do that with my very large pages as you

say.

        In another group someone mentioned that Adobe Photoshop will stitch

together

        pdfs so I may try that with some of the 11 x 17s. I wasn’t aware

Photoshop

        would do graphics like that. 

        

        Thanks again for your reply.

        

        Randy B.

        

        From: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> 

        [mailto:Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> ] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon

        Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 8:38 PM

        To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> 

        Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder]

        

        Randy,

        

        Rather than scan large schematics piecemeal, simply take the sheets

to a

        commercial graphics shop (some Kinko's may have the 11 by 17

equipment) and

        have them scan the document in one piece. My local graphics shop can

handle

        huge schematics, so I take all Motorola and GE fold-out sheets

(which are up

        to 34 inches wide) and have them scanned directly to PDF and put on

a CD or

        thumb drive.

        

        73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

        

        -----Original Message-----

        From: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> 

        <mailto:Repeater- Builder%40yahoog roups.com> 

        [mailto:Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> 

        <mailto:Repeater- Builder%40yahoog roups.com> ] On Behalf Of R.K.

Brumback

        Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 3:24 PM

        To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups

.com> 

        <mailto:Repeater- Builder%40yahoog roups.com> ;

        Manual_Exchange@ yahoogroups. com

<http://us.mc335.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Manual_Exchange%40yahoogroups.

com>  <mailto:Manual_ Exchange% 40yahoogroups. com> 

        Subject: [Repeater-Builder]

        

        Does anyone know or use a program where I can scan large schematics

a little

        at a time and then connect them back in a file like a pdf file? I

can’t

        afford a large bed scanner but I have several 11x17s I would like to

scan on

        my 8 ½ x 11 scanner.

        

        Randy

        

        





 

      

    
    
        
        
        
        


        


        
        
_________________________________________________________________
Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox Find out how here
http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=823454

Reply via email to