I think AM stations have tighter frequency requirements. I think I
read some where it was supposed to be + or - 5 hz, of course that is
only at 1 to 2 MHz which is still 5ppm stability.

Isnt CDMA supposed to use GPS locked rubidium standards? See i you can
find aa control channel in the 800-900 MHz range.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> At 9/5/2009 21:20, you wrote:
>> > OK, now that NTSC video is gone, so are my handy local video
>> > carriers that
>> > I used to use to check the frequency accuracy of my signal
>> > generators. However, I understand that there are pilot
>> > carriers buried
>> > within the 8VSB DTV signals that can be used for the same purpose. A
>> > couple of Google searches revealed that DTV ch. 7 is supposed
>> > to have a
>> > pilot at 174.310 MHz. Putting my old FM-10 on 174.310 &
>> > listening to the
>> > beat signal on my R-100, I heard a heterodyne of ~500 Hz. I
>> > thought that
>> > error was a bit high, so checked a few other DTV pilots (186.310 &
>> > 198.310). Interestingly, they were off by the same amount. I
>> > moved the
>> > FM-10 to 15 MHz & checked it against WWVH; heterodyne was
>> > ~1.5 Hz, equating
>> > to ~18 Hz @ 180 MHz, not ~500 Hz. My best guess is that the
>> > ATSC pilots
>> > are actually 309.450 kHz above the bottom of each channel,
>> > and the 310 kHz
>> > reference is an approximation.
>> >
>> > Can anyone confirm the above?
>> >
>> > Bob NO6B
>>
>>You're trying to make it easier than it is Bob :-)
>>
>>Normally it would be 309.440559 kHz above the bottom of the channel.  That's
>>a real big "normally".
>
> OK, thanks.  Well as long as they don't change with the seasons...
>
> I took a closer look at chs. 7, 9, 11 & 13 today.  I see 7 at 174.309450, 9
> at 186.309441, 11 at 198.309730 & 13 at 210.309716.  Since the errors
> between the frequencies are not linear, I suspect that they're either some
> exceptions to the normal freq., or possibly just loose freq. tolerances.
>
> Bob NO6B
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to