Bob, you might consider picking up a rubidium frequency standard, they
are <$100 on ebay. In fact there's a $77 buy it now listing
with free shipping at the moment:
http://cgi.ebay.com/10MHZ-EFRATOM-LPRO-101-Rubidium-Frequency-Standard-DHL_W0QQitemZ270442620847QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item3ef7a2e7af&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

You'll need a heatsink and a 24 volts power supply.  A GPS locked
standard would be ultimate, but they are more like $300.

73's Skip WB6YMH

--- In [email protected], n...@... wrote:
>
> At 9/5/2009 21:20, you wrote:
> > > OK, now that NTSC video is gone, so are my handy local video
> > > carriers that
> > > I used to use to check the frequency accuracy of my signal
> > > generators. However, I understand that there are pilot
> > > carriers buried
> > > within the 8VSB DTV signals that can be used for the same purpose. A
> > > couple of Google searches revealed that DTV ch. 7 is supposed
> > > to have a
> > > pilot at 174.310 MHz. Putting my old FM-10 on 174.310 &
> > > listening to the
> > > beat signal on my R-100, I heard a heterodyne of ~500 Hz. I
> > > thought that
> > > error was a bit high, so checked a few other DTV pilots (186.310 &
> > > 198.310). Interestingly, they were off by the same amount. I
> > > moved the
> > > FM-10 to 15 MHz & checked it against WWVH; heterodyne was
> > > ~1.5 Hz, equating
> > > to ~18 Hz @ 180 MHz, not ~500 Hz. My best guess is that the
> > > ATSC pilots
> > > are actually 309.450 kHz above the bottom of each channel,
> > > and the 310 kHz
> > > reference is an approximation.
> > >
> > > Can anyone confirm the above?
> > >
> > > Bob NO6B
> >
> >You're trying to make it easier than it is Bob :-)
> >
> >Normally it would be 309.440559 kHz above the bottom of the channel.  That's
> >a real big "normally".
> 
> OK, thanks.  Well as long as they don't change with the seasons...
> 
> I took a closer look at chs. 7, 9, 11 & 13 today.  I see 7 at 174.309450, 9 
> at 186.309441, 11 at 198.309730 & 13 at 210.309716.  Since the errors 
> between the frequencies are not linear, I suspect that they're either some 
> exceptions to the normal freq., or possibly just loose freq. tolerances.
> 
> Bob NO6B
>


Reply via email to