You could combine two close spaced transmitters using a 
hybrid and the right combination will work through one 
duplexer.  Just throwing out one method... 

s.  

> "n3dab" <rb_n3...@...> wrote:
>
> It would be interesting to hear how you would connect TWO 2Mtr. radios 
> (assuming a standard .600khz split and a single antenna connector on each) 
> thru a duplexer(s) to a single feed line and antenna.  What type duplexer(s) 
> are you suggesting ?  Have you done this before ?  Just curious. 
> 
> Doug  N3DAB 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Chris Robinson <kf6nfw@> wrote:
> >
> > under the description you give you can put them on top of each other
> > separated by a 1/2 wave or better without any real problems. if you are only
> > going  to transmit on one at a time then you wont have any reall issues.
> >  You will be able to run up to about 25 W without any problems that I can
> > think of.
> >  I run a couple radios here at home and have the antennas relative close and
> > only have problems when i kick up over 25W and then it is just some noise
> > but nothing strong enough to kill the receive on the other rig.
> > 
> >  You can still use a duplexer and run two rigs to same antenna without any
> > problems as well. then you would only have the one coax to worry about
> > really. tends to make things cleaner looking on the install too!
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Jeremy (KB1REQ) <kb1req@> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The icom runs a max of about 65 watts but almost always less, more like 5
> > > or 10. The antenna I hope to set up is a mobile 5/8 waxe over a
> > > ground-plane. My purpose is for skywarn activations, as an NCO it would 
> > > help
> > > to be active one two frequencies nearly simultainously.
> > > Any further help is appriceated.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In 
> > > [email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > > "Eric Lemmon" <wb6fly@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jeremy,
> > > >
> > > > You did not provide enough information to give you a good answer. How 
> > > > far
> > > > apart are the frequencies involved? How powerful is the other radio?
> > > >
> > > > What I can tell you right away is that vertical separation is far, far,
> > > more
> > > > effective than horizontal separation. If both radios are going to be
> > > > frequency-agile, that is, there may not always be a fixed separation in
> > > > frequency, then the simple answer is: Separate the two antennas
> > > vertically
> > > > as much as you can, one over the other, and hope for the best. Use
> > > > double-shielded cable for feedlines on both antennas.
> > > >
> > > > Damage to the receivers is not likely, since most good radios have diode
> > > > protection on the front ends. After all, look at almost any "mobile
> > > command
> > > > post" vehicle, and you'll probably see a dozen antennas on the roof-
> > > usually
> > > > no more than a foot or so apart. Although major desense is almost
> > > > guaranteed when any one of the radios transmits, judicious use of
> > > > preselectors (such as those made by DCI) can minimize it.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: 
> > > > [email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > [mailto:[email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>]
> > > On Behalf Of Jeremy (KB1REQ)
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 6:24 PM
> > > > To: [email protected]<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Antenna spacing
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This post does not necessarily relate to repeaters, but some of the same
> > > > calculations can be applied. I am interested in installing another two
> > > meter
> > > > radio in my shack and was wondering what kind of spacing is needed as to
> > > not
> > > > over load either of the radio's receivers. I currently have an icom set
> > > up
> > > > on a j-pole, and I have a 45 watt GM300 that I want to add. What would 
> > > > be
> > > > the best placement of antennas to reduce desense. or otherwise damage 
> > > > the
> > > > receivers?
> > > >
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to