voip can be very relyable.
You just have to set it up right. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Smith
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 7:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] dispatch centers run through the internet

  

VoIP is used daily and has been for over five years for mission-critical
applications such major electric and gas utilities and public safety. VoIP
isn't the problem, it's the transport medium.
 
Bill

--- On Mon, 1/4/10, Don E. Wisdom <[email protected]> wrote:



        From: Don E. Wisdom <[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] dispatch centers run through the
internet
        To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
        Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 6:08 PM
        
        
        try again.  I am a network engineer and I can tell you all it takes
is one mistake or routing loop extended power failure etc and your down for
a while.  Anyone who would even think about doing this over the internet
needs their head checked.   Ask yourself this question... If your power goes
out at home & you have comcast digital voice (that goes over the cable
modem) and someone robs your house.. What does your alarm do?  Nothing! it
cant call out because the power is out.  VoIP is not a technology that
anyone should be relying on for LIFE SAFETY things.  
        
        the standard SLA on a T1 connection is 4 hours.  (and it should be
since it costs $4-500/month) realistically they aren't going to fix it until
they're 4 hours are up.  Home/business DSL connections typically have no SLA
or it isn't worth the toilet paper it is printed upon.  Its been proven
multiple times in the last year (san francisco fiber cut, deep sea fiber
cuts, turkey stealing youtube's ip space etc) that the internet is not 190%
reliable.  You have to remember that you may have a competent admin but you
are just as vulnerable if someone else does not have one. 
        One other thing.. 99.99% of VoIP applications use UDP which is a
connectionless protocol.  meaning that the side sending it has no clue if it
got there.  Simply put it either gets there or doesn't and you have no idea
which. 
        
        This is a bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad idea.  No insurance
company in their right mind will touch this.  I'd heard that the NFPA is
also looking at banning VoIP's use for fire alarm systems.
        
        --Don
        
        
        On Jan 4, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Jed Barton wrote:
        
        > exactly what i thought.
        > People can say relyability, but your internet connection is
probably a hell
        > of a lot more relyable than a typical verizon phone line. 
        > 
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> 
        > [mailto:[email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> ] On Behalf Of Barry
        > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:43 PM
        > To: [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> 
        > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] dispatch centers run through the
internet
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > It's done very day ,a good  vpn and intranet  and very difficult
to
        > interfere, with short of a direct physical connection there is
little better
        > so I don't understand all the fuss . Some one posted a good remote
radio
        > controller so the rest is down to the skills of the system admin
B ( and
        > yes I have had training in the area)
        > 
        > 
        > ________________________________
        > 
        > To: [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> 
        > From: [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> 
        > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:24:08 -0700
        > Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] dispatch centers run through the
internet
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > Given the inherit instability of the internet (it was NEVER
designed to do
        > what we are doing with it), I would consider any communications
system which
        > is reliant upon the internet to be flawed by design and completely
        > untrustworthy. 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > My two cents worth. 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > From: [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> 
        > [mailto:[email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> ] On Behalf Of WA3GIN
        > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 6:23 PM
        > To: [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> 
        > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] dispatch centers run through the
internet
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > Yes, and they are called Intranets.  
        > 
        > 
        > 
        >     ----- Original Message ----- 
        > 
        >     From: Kevin Custer <mailto:[email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> >  
        > 
        >     To: [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> 
        > <mailto:[email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
om> >  
        > 
        >     Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:55 PM
        > 
        >     Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] dispatch centers run through
the
        > internet
        > 
        >      
        > 
        >       
        > 
        >     The Internet is a shared medium. A private WAN/LAN commonly
utilizes
        > 
        >     fiber optic cable or licensed wireless networking to
accomplish 
        >     connectivity. While private systems can deliver Internet, it
is not 
        >     (necessarily) THE Internet. Privately owned facilities like
what
        > many 
        >     CATV, Phone, Internet, and combinations of them can have dark
fiber
        > or 
        >     reserved virtual space that cannot get clogged with Internet
        > overhead. 
        >     The bottlenecking you might experience with facilities you
cannot
        > (do 
        >     not) control can (will) be the downfall of such a system -
unless a
        > SLA 
        >     can be gotten. A SLA is a service level agreement in which a
company
        > 
        >     guarantees connectivity - to some degree. The more reliability
the 
        >     agreement extends - the higher the cost.
        >     
        >     Kevin Custer
        >     
        >     > Jed Barton wrote:
        >     > tell me about this system a little bit. 
        >     > 
        >     >
        >     > You'll note that the manufacturer is not suggesting that you
        > utilize the
        >     > Internet for this device. It is marketed for use on a
private
        > LAN/WAN.
        >     > 
        >     > Chuck
        >     > WB2EDV
        >     
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > ________________________________
        > 
        > Meet singles at ninemsn dating Looking for a great date?
        > <http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/
<http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/> >  
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > ------------------------------------
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > Yahoo! Groups Links
        > 
        > 
        > 
        
        
        
        ------------------------------------
        
        
        
        Yahoo! Groups Links
        
        
            (Yahoo! ID required)
        
roups.com>  
            [email protected]
<http://us.mc624.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder-fullfeatured@
yahoogroups.com> 
        
ahoogroups.com> 
        
        
        



Reply via email to