also add some kind of AM compatibile signaling method control the opening and closing of the squelch on the receiver.
something that is not prone to falsing. ----- Original Message ----- From: "i recycle computers" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 4:10 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Just a Crazy Thought > simple enough to add a MURS auxillary receiver to facilitate DTMF control > of > the 11 meter repeater and to be able to disable the repeater should users > start to get really out of hand. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "skipp025" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 4:00 PM > Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Just a Crazy Thought > > >>> "i recycle computers" <kc8...@...> wrote: >>> I personally think as long as you are running in band, not >>> causing out of band interference, and keep at 4 watts or >>> below the FCC won't really care. >> >> They don't care much right now... but if you're causing >> enough grief or trouble enough to swing the evil eye of >> Sauron your direction, then you have bigger problems about >> to happen. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauron >> >>> it seems they only respond when someone runs illegal >>> power with illegal modes who is interfering with stuff >>> outside the regular 40 channels. >> >> No, they only seem to want to respond when something is so >> bad it can't be ignored. Or it's a broadcast related issue... >> It's been reported there is a lot of money in broadcast but >> those of us who work there haven't seen much of it yet. >> >>> otherwise they don't seem to care what goes on with CB >>> anymore. >> >> It's not "anymore" it was not really "ever" except maybe back >> in the 1960's and early 1970's when things were different. >> Men were men and sheep were nervous and the FCC had a lot >> more personal with enforcement on their collective minds. >> Yes, the Borg were around back then... >> >> s. >> >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Bill Smith" <brsc...@...> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:15 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Just a Crazy Thought >>> >>> >>> Yes, they existed. We used split sites with a POTS line between them and >>> VOX >>> operation. RX on 23 and TX on 1 for example. We experimented with CTCSS >>> but >>> it wasn't very reliable with out the FM capture effect. This was in the >>> northeast back in the days of 23 channel CB so the statute of >>> limitations >>> has long since expired. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: i recycle computers <kc8...@...> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Thu, February 11, 2010 8:29:25 PM >>> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Just a Crazy Thought >>> >>> I have heard numorous urban legends of 27 MHz CB repeaters being built. >>> >>> has anyone ever come across such a thing. if not does anyone think it is >>> even possible from a technical standpoint? >>> >>> the limitations are AM mode, and using any of the 40 CB channels with 4 >>> watts PEP AM or 12 Watts PEP SSB ie: using completely un modified type >>> certified CB gear. >>> >>> Legally a repeater is illegal on CB, but i just want to do an excersize >>> in >>> thought as to what problems someone may run into with such a project, >>> etc. >>> >>> i have seen this questioned asked numorous times through the years and >>> even >>> heard rumors of it actually being done. >>> >>> no one though has actually went deep into the technical aspects of such >>> a >>> project or could point me out to the people who are operating or >>> operated >>> such a setup. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis >>> >>> I Recycle Computers >>> >>> "Saving UnWanted PC's From The Landfill One Computer At A Time :)" >>> >>> Listen To My Free Live Police Scanner Feed for Tuscaloosa / Northport >>> http://www.radioreference.com/apps/audio/?feedId=3836 >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links >>> >>> >>> >>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >>> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
