So... is anyone gonna buy one of these things to see just what kind of interference it will actually make in the 70cm band? 1 watt max and .25 watt nominal is enough to key up a poorly tuned and set up nearby repeater or a distant sensitively configured repeater, and enough to produce decent QRM on existing nearby voice and data communications especially as it is using an analog video and operational control system.
-Brian / KF4ZWZ On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard <gbis-reply-...@gbis.com> wrote: > > > Since they'd be competing with high powered repeaters and government > radars, I thought 2.4 gig would have been a better choice than 70cm, but > that's just me... > > Richard > www.n7tgb.net > > Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. > -- Ronald Reagan > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto: > repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *DCFluX > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM > > *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm > Band > > > > Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest of the garbage. > > >
