Actually, DPL/PL doesn't help. It only signals to the receiver when to open squelch is all. If someone is transmitting and this thing decides to transmit at the same time, you'll get an earful of noise, PL or not.
-Brian On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM, WA3GIN <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What? Just go and turn on your PL... come on! Lets use the technology > that we claim we know so well... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Brian Raker <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 4:51 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm > Band > > > > So... is anyone gonna buy one of these things to see just what kind of > interference it will actually make in the 70cm band? 1 watt max and .25 > watt nominal is enough to key up a poorly tuned and set up nearby repeater > or a distant sensitively configured repeater, and enough to produce decent > QRM on existing nearby voice and data communications especially as it is > using an analog video and operational control system. > > -Brian / KF4ZWZ > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Since they'd be competing with high powered repeaters and government >> radars, I thought 2.4 gig would have been a better choice than 70cm, but >> that's just me... >> >> Richard >> www.n7tgb.net >> >> Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. >> -- Ronald Reagan >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *DCFluX >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:24 PM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Fw: FCC R&O Involving the Amateur 70cm >> Band >> >> >> >> Take that crap up to 2.4 GHz with the rest of the garbage. >> >> >> > > > >
