Nope.  Both braids are silver-plated, so there's no dissimilar metals, and
no foil to rub against.  RG-214/U and RG-400/U are often specified for
duplexers.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable

  

Any problems with RG-214 or RG223 for duplexers/multi-couplers/combiners?

lh


On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Dan Saputo <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:


          

        

well-documented and caused mainly by the use of foil shielding as in the lmr
series. gets worse as cable ages and internal braid-foil contact degrades.
Although not as big of a problem with lmr due to an insulating layer over
the actual foil.  beware of belden 9913 and lmr look-alikes.  trouble when
used duplex.
 
Dan
k8plw

--- On Sun, 3/7/10, Chuck Kelsey <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:



        From: Chuck Kelsey <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
        Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
        To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
        Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010, 4:56 PM
        
        
          
        Passive Intermod. In other words, it tends to be a source in which
intermod 
        can be generated easily.
        
        Chuck
        WB2EDV
        
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: "rffun" <radio...@her. forthnet. gr
<http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=radiocom%40her.forthnet.gr> >
        To: <Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
<http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups
.com> >
        Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:33 PM
        Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
        
        > <LMR and similar cables are not rated for low PIM>
        > What exactly do you mean by PIM ?
        > rffun
        >
        > --- In Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
<http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups
.com> , Larry Horlick <llhorl...@. ..> 
        > wrote:
        >>
        >> Indeed. I'll read the archives. Thanks.
        >>
        >> 73
        >>
        >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Chuck Kelsey <wb2...@...> wrote:
        >>
        >> >
        >> >
        >> > The subject comes up on this list about every other week. I can
only 
        >> > assume
        >> > you are new.
        >> >
        >> > LMR and similar cables are not rated for low PIM, a fact
verified by 
        >> > the
        >> > manufacturer.
        >> >
        >> > Chuck
        >> > WB2EDV
        >> >
        >> >
        >> >
        >> > ----- Original Message -----
        >> > *From:* Larry Horlick <llhorl...@. ..>
        >> > *To:* Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
<http://us.mc560.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups
.com> 
        >> > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2010 8:49 PM
        >> > *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Stock Power Supplies
        >> >
        >> > I've never heard of it. As an installer, I'm always under
pressure to 
        >> > use
        >> > less expensive feedlines than the venerable Heliax, and I had
often
        >> > considered LMR, but never actually succumbed to the temptation.
This is
        >> > interesting information. Is this a well documented phenomenon?
        >> >
        >> > Anyone else like to chime in on this...
        >> >
        >> > Larry
        >> >
        >> >
        >> >
        >> >
        >> >
        >>
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > ------------ --------- --------- ------
        >
        >
        >
        > Yahoo! Groups Links
        >
        >
        >
        
        ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
        
        No virus found in this incoming message.
        Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
        Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2728 - Release Date:
03/07/10 
        02:34:00
        
        


        




Reply via email to