Skip
I appreciate your reply. I currently have an old Johnson CR1000 that a 
converted to the 440 band about ten years ago. It has worked ok but its time to 
move on. I have been offered a remote receive site in the center of my town of 
100,000. It is the top of a building about 230 feet high so not much feedline 
to deal with. I already have a R304 and a T304 hamtronics in a box with an 
NHRC-micro controller for the remote site. It will link back on 440.1 MHz. So 
what I want to do is replace my Johnson with several more Hamtronic receivers 
feeding a LDG voter controlled by an NHRC-10. On the transmit side I want to 
use a T304 or T306 to feed two watts into a Vocom 200 watt amplifer. I will be 
useing an Astron 70 amp power supply and a Motorola duplexer. The repeater site 
will have two antennas. One up at about 200 feet for transmit and receive. 
Another up about 100 feet to receive my remote links. I am excited about this 
project. Can you give me anymore advice?
thanks
Ben K9BF

--- In [email protected], "skipp025" <skipp...@...> wrote:
>
> A Hamtronics versus a Kenwood Repeater... 
> 
> > If you are considering purchasing the Hamtronics REP-200 
> > repeater, I would spend my money on a Kenwood TKR750/850 
> > series repeater. They are about the same price, but the 
> > Kenwood is a much better built piece of equipment and has 
> > a decent built-in controller for basic operation.
> 
> As a huge and long time fan of Hamtronics gear and of course 
> a full Kenwood Dealer and Service Station... I have to say 
> I'm in a corner regarding the above statements... 
> 
> Both complete Repeaters are in the same price range and of course 
> the Kenwood is a commercial quality/spec unit. But the Hamtronics 
> unit is also quite usable, has more desired Amateur Radio 
> Operational features (because of the internal controller). The 
> Hamtronics Repeater in basic form is lower in transmit power 
> output and the chassis is not as rugged (thick metal chassis 
> parts). But there's nothing wrong with the supplied chassis of 
> the Hamtronics Repeater if you buy the pre-made complete repeater 
> versus installing transmit and receive modules in your own 
> box of your selected size and material(s). 
> 
> Unless you install an additional external repeater controller onto 
> the Kenwood Repeater... you don't get an Auto-patch (telephone 
> interconnect), the ability to command CTCSS (PL) and Carrier 
> Squelch operation on/off and a number of other "bells and whistles" 
> you could research by inventorying the feature set page of the 
> Hamtronics Repeater Controller Manual (on their web page). 
> 
> > If you were looking to buy just the individual pieces from 
> > Hamtronics and put your own repeater chassis together, I 
> > would prefer to use just about any commercial equipment 
> > instead of those pieces. 
> 
> ... which shows a fairly obvious bias against Hamtronics Equipment 
> for what-ever reason good or bad. 
> 
> There's nothing wrong with current Hamtronics, Hi-Pro and 
> similar products if you understand what you get when you buy 
> them. They tend to be very decent performers and in the case 
> of the Hamtronics unit... probably also FCC Type Accepted. 
> 
> > I am not sure what features you are looking for in the 
> > controller but there is a large amount of support available 
> > in the amateur community for Arcom, NHRC, CAT, ICS, and 
> > Link-Comm controllers. The Pacific Research Controller 
> > does not seem to be used much in our area but it looks 
> > like it will do most things a person would need.
> 
> So will the Hamtronics COR-5 Repeater Controller
> 
> > Good luck with your project.
> 
> I suspect the selection of radio products would obviously come 
> down to motivation and money.  If you bought a ready to 
> rock-and-roll Kenwood TKR-850 Repeater (from me :-) you'd be 
> pretty much in a plug & play situation once you had a duplexer 
> & antenna scheme in place. You could then or later install 
> an external repeater controller onto the TKR-850 if you needed 
> additional operational features not available with the "stock 
> TKR-850 repeater controller". 
> 
> If you were interested in a converted surplus radio package, 
> you could save a bit of money and probably have to get more 
> into the technical details of the equipment while trying to 
> get it on the air. There are also a fairly large number of 
> usable repeaters made from surplus Mobile Radios connected 
> "back to back" with basic logic and audio cables.
> 
> You could also go with a more modular and hand constructed 
> Hamtronics, Hi-Pro Modular type of repeater project, which 
> is a favorite topic of mine. You will learn a lot more about 
> both repeater and radio operation if you construct your own 
> repeater. 
> 
> There is a serious glut of cheap, high quality surplus radio 
> gear available at flea markets and Ebay... so all bets are off 
> on pricing on that type of gear... you might even find people 
> willing to donate equipment for little or nothing. 
> 
> When 224 MHz band repeater operation is desired... there is 
> less plug and play gear available, so cases like building a 
> project using Hamtronics and Converted Surplus gear should be 
> a lot more cost effective.  Indeed I've done many a project 
> from Hamtronics and Hi-Pro Modules (as well as a number of 
> other brands) and of course have provided examples of these 
> projects in photos available in the Group Photos Section: 
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/photos/album/1157128983/pic/list
>  
> 
> You could easily duplicate the above mentioned project in 
> the UHF 445 MHz Amateur Band with great results.  Keep in mind 
> you have to do all the hardware (chassis holes, wiring, mounting 
> of modules, testing... etc) but if you're into that type of 
> building there's a lot of fun and knowledge to be had... 
> 
> So, I'm an advocate of both the buy-it or build it repeater 
> method. You have to figure out how much time, money and 
> resources you want or are willing  to apply toward getting 
> things done (a repeater on the air). 
> 
> And of course "Repeaters are like opinions..." or is it the 
> converse? 
> 
> cheers, 
> skipp 
> 
> skipp025 at yahoo.com 
> 
> > > "k9bf" <k9bf@> wrote:
> > > Hi all.
> > > I am thinking about implementing the above products into 
> > > a repeater. I would like some comments from those that 
> > > have experience with any of them. Also, does anyone have 
> > > any for sale? This is for a UHF machine and would use the 
> > > newer Hamtronics components. 
> > > Thanks and 73
> > > Ben K9BF
>


Reply via email to