Yep - SP50 was on the side. P50+ was a contact at about the 1 o'clock position on the board behind the battery.
P50 was also available in Low Band which was the tall case and 6W. Joe M. kevin valentino wrote: > > > Got a friend in a convalescent home, studying for his ticket now. That > would be perfect for him. > Let me know. > P50+ programming pins on side if I remember correctly ? > > --- On *Fri, 4/9/10, La Rue Communications /<[email protected]>/* wrote: > > > From: La Rue Communications <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Radius P50 > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 12:10 PM > > > Landfill - For sure! (If they're not working) These have the UHF > frequency still adhered to the battery panel, so I have very strong > reason to beleive these are UHF and not VHF hiding in a UHF case. > Doesnt appear to be tampered with or pry marks indicating it was > opened before. (Thank goodness). I really hope I dont have to PAY > anyone to take these off my hands in the future! > > I just noticed I *STILL* have my Tall Radius P50+ with a numeric > touchpad still sitting on my shelf I thought I got rid of MONTHS > ago. Its come back to haunt me!! (Anyone want it?) :) > > John Hymes > La Rue Communications > 10 S. Aurora Street > Stockton, CA 95202 > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* wd8chl > <http://us.mc837.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > *To:* Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com > > <http://us.mc837.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Friday, April 09, 2010 7:20 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Radius P50 > > > On 4/8/2010 3:18 PM, La Rue Communications wrote: > > Two questions on this unit. > > > > 1) Does anyone know the nomenclature for this? I have checked out > > several different versions, including one that was built for > > assignments dated after 3/10/02. I tried to check it out with it, > > however, it doesnt match up when it came to the power level > code. So > > I scrapped that one. Google searches turn up a pair of them > listed on > > eBay for 250 bucks. (Who are they kidding?) > > heh... > > > Model number is H (For Handheld) 44GNU1120BN. I beleive it is > a UHF, > > but I would like to know the rest of the specs, spacing, > packages, > > etc. > > well, the second '4' means UHF, so yes, unless someone put a VHF > radio > in a UHF case... > > > 2) One the same units, I have a "Tall" one and a "Short" one. > Battery > > sizes are clearly the differing factor. Does that mean Power > levels > > come into play here? > > <scratches head> Isn't a P50 the cheapy xtal radio from the > early 90's? > Maybe 4-channel tops? If so, the 'tall' vs. 'short' was carrier > squelch > vs. PL/DPL. So yes, that means converting a CSQ radio to PL means > changing the case... > And no, these are NOT narrowbnad compatible, so they have no > value in > Part 90. And they were pretty cheap, flimsy radios, hard to work > on, > easy to break, I wouldn't take one for free... > Land fill... > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Internal Virus Database is out of date. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.783 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2746 - Release Date: 03/14/10 > 03:33:00 >
